Jump to content

me

Members
  • Posts

    125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by me

  1. quote: SO WHAT? What if it does kill civilians? Those are the people that support the Taliban and those are the people that are willing to fight to the death to protect osama. Then by your Rational the September 11th attacks were fully justified. Like you said, so WHAT if it kills Civilians. Civilian Casualties happen, what is Important is that we TRY to avoid it. We cannot avoid it, but we can try. IF we stop caring about civilian casualties we become the Monster they are trying to make us into. Genocide is NOT the answer, Genocide will never BE the answer. What do you expect them to do once we Drop a Nuke on their country Killing 30,000 people, stop and rejoice because we kicked out the Taliban? NO, they will NOT, they will curse our name, and Strive HARDER to bring about the Downfall of the "Evil American Empire." When You hit somebody they hit back, The Taliban Hit us, we are hitting the taliban, now you want to go out and dig mass graves for the Afgani people? quote: but are you willing to loose American soldiers to protect those people who wouldn't even fight for themselfes and let their government kill their families and then go into other countries and kill civilians What do you expect them to do? throw rocks at the Taliban? Their Civilians have no arms. The ones who do ARE Fighting the Taliban they are known as the Northern Alliance. The secret is not to kill them, not to convince them their way is wrong. The secret is to convince them Our way is better. That is how you bring sombody to your side. Not fight them, not hurt them, not Kill them. Teach them. There is NO better way to do this then to go OUT of our way to Avoid killing Civilians. Would I put American Soldiers Lives at risk to avoid killing Civilians within reason? Yes I would. And I say this as One of those Soldiers who has Served his country, and will do so again if they require it. I still have many friends in the Military, and I think of this alot. There is one thing to remember, our soldiers are Volunteers. They Have CHOSEN to put themselves on the firing line for Us. I do not want to go to a war, and have to try to kill people, nor have people try to kill me, that is not the point, I will go if I am needed. But the Afgani People were NOT given a choice, they were TOLD, this is the way it shall be. We are there to help GIVE them a choice. If they do not want to fight the Taliban then that is THEIR choice to make. We cannot expect them to fight our war, and it is OUR war, not theirs. By your rational of they are responsible, then YOU are responsible for the Attrocities commited in Vietnam by AMERICAN Soldiers, and there WERE attrocities. You cannot Blame the Afgani people for this. You cannot Kill them, you cannot lock them in Prison. They are not to blame, they are not protecting osama, they are getting the hell out of our way, they are welcoming the Northern Alliance into the cities they have taken. If ONE nuke gets dropped, it undermines All that has been accomplished, this world wide coalition against terrorism will disolve, because then WE will be terrorists. Killing their Civilians will not bring ours back, Killing bin laden will not bring them back, this is NOT about revenge, this is Not about punishment, this is about helping to prevent it from happening by these same people in the future. Will this war succeed? well, we Will destroy the Taliban, and bin laden, will it stop Terrorism? Nope. But it still needs to be fought.
  2. quote: Tactical Nuclear weapons have thier place, just as all weapons do, except for Chemical and biological, these are too uncontrollable as far as I am concerned to be a viable weapon against military targets, they are far more likely to spread into civilian populations. I feel that about Nuclear, to likely to spread to the civilian Populations. Yes, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both Military bases as well as cities. But the Fallout spreads FAR and stays forever. Well enough of this, we are taking this thread off topic. If you wish to continue to debate this go ahead and create a new thread.
  3. quote: Where did you hear this little piece of propaganda? I did not, that is my opinion. Unfortunatly Historically speaking the ONLY use of a Nuclear weapon has been to destroy a civilian target(2 of them to be exact.) quote: It is fatally flawed, in a number of respects, first a nuke is a bomb, a messy bomb but a bomb none the less. There are a number of different sizes of nuclear bomb. From a deep diggin tactical of around 10 kiloton to a city buster in the megaton range. quote: About 90,000-140,000 people were killed those who where still alive writhed in agony from their burns. The atom bomb obliterated more than 10 sq km/4 sq mi and there was very heavy damage outside that area. This quote was taken from this web page and If I am not mistaken wasn't the bomb dropped on Hiroshima 2 Kiloton? I think your statement has more propaganda in it then mine does. Now granted the US has done a lot to further Nuclear munitions, such as cutting down on the radiation and other nasty side effects. Also if I'm not mistaken, around 1996 wasn't part of the treaty with Russia to dismantle the Majority of our Tactical Nuclear weaponry, keeping Nuclear power in the Strategic theatre? I seem to remember reading something about that, don't remember the details nor where I read it(or even if I did for that matter). The Fact remains however the Only use that a Nuclear weapon has been put to is to Destroy a City. That is the Only Use FOR a Nuclear weapon in my opinion. It is kind of Overkill to take out 4 sq miles when we can send a Laser guided smart bomb through a window of our choice from 15,000 feet. Don't ya think? EDIT:Correction, The Hiroshima Bomb was 20Kiloton, My mistake. (should have looked that up BEFORE posting) [ 11-16-2001: Message edited by: Melcar ]
  4. quote: Well, nukes will even the sides up... afraid I have to disagree here, Nukes have one purpose when used, to kill Civilians. Nobody wins when the Nukes start flying.
  5. me

    New Logo and Sig Test

    My turn for a test, Hopefully this works... I accidentaly linked my name to Lord David's in the Database... Oops. It should be against the Rules for one simple dropped Number to Link to our Most Mortal Enemies.
  6. ATAPI - Advanced Technology Attachment Packet Interface.
  7. INSANE!!?!?!?!? US?!?!? welll...yeah, ok ya gotta point... Now, who's got the VacPacks(BETTER than Medpacks!)
  8. If you reread this page and notice the SC's Post you will see that he has already answered this question: quote: EBgames.com will start shipping units by 11/19 (processing has already begun)
  9. Sure, Basic Input Output System. HOWEVER, that being the case, why will a CD-rom drive still not work in DOS(REAL Mode)Without a SEPERATE cd-rom Driver, AND MSCDEX.exe(takes the driver and assigns a Driver letter.) For Example take a 486DX2(Or early Pentium), NO Bios support for IDE CD-ROMS install win95, win95 Will NOT require a driver for the CD, DOS still does, Hence, the Driver is incorperated into the OS, if the BIOS support were all that were required the computer would view the drive similar to an IDE HDD, No driver.
  10. me

    TTFN

    quote: T I double ga ER So what's a TIgagaER?
  11. quote:quote: What? I have IE4 in Win98 and it doesn't let me remove it. You just don't know how. Doesn't mean you can't. I've tried uninstalling THIRD party programs and have ran into problems similar to yours. Those things just happen. There's a little thing on your PC called a System Registry. Start learning how to use that. Just because YOU can't do something doesn't mean it cannot be done. Aramike: Microsoft Testified in court that IE could NOT be removed from Win98. You CAN remove the Icon from the Desktop, but the IE code will still be there. quote: Now I know you don't know what you're talking about. A DVD drive doesn't USE drivers, just like a floppy drive, a normal CD drive, etc. Now, what you need is a controller on the PC, which requires drivers. That isn't difficult to obtain and can simply be compiled in Linux format. The same thing goes into the home DVD players. You are also slightly mistaken on this one Aramike, a CD drive DOES use a device driver. Microsoft simply incorperated it's own CD-rom driver into the OS. This does not mean a Driver is not present.
  12. LOL, hey if the Insurgents want to include us in all their communications who are we to complain?
  13. Well, There's alot of benefits... Faster Load times(Due to less Disk Cacheing for one) Smoother game play(for same reason) well... there's alot, but those are the only two that come to mind immediatly.
  14. Yes, they do have some nice toys they are playing with, the Rail Gun, and X-Ray Laser started Development with the Star Wars SDI project I believe. Even the New Infantry Rifle they are working on is pretty Damn impressive. Read an Article on it a couple years ago, in Popular Science(I think). 5.56mm Rifle, with 20mm HE Gernade launcher, the weapon is supposed to be accurate out to 1000 Yards(using the computerized scope/Rangefinder). It was supposed to have some type of helmet hook-up, so the Infantrymen could use it to Fire around corners.
  15. me

    Hi guys.

    quote:May the Computer Gods be with you as you build it. Remember, You can appease the Computer Gods by sacrificing Virgin Floppy Disks to them.
  16. quote: Disregarding the part of the suit "reading" the pilot's mind (taken from the book), the suit itself is incredibly in-the-reach of today's tech. I don't remember that part from the book. The control I remember being described was simply Pressure plates on the inside of the suit. The driver Moves, Putting pressure on the plate, the suit responds by moving to take pressure off the plate. [ 11-10-2001: Message edited by: Melcar ]
  17. me

    Pegasus Wing?

    So ummm, when did I get moved to Pegasus?
  18. quote: I really wish we would get out BTW and the reason we haven't is because of weak leaders in our senate and house of representatives. $iLk wouldn't it be better to work from the inside for the changes that you want, instead of just abandoning the entire thing?
  19. Well, for consoles I own a PS, and an N64. I probably will not get any of The Three new ones(PS2, Gamecube, Xbox). They do have some games I would Like to play for PS2 - MGS2, Soul Reaver2... But if they do a PC port I'll be happy, if not I'll wait till the PS2 sells for $100, and the games for $20. I prefer the PC because as Jaquar pointed out, the PC is upgradable, the console isn't.
  20. Maybe it's time the SC created a new Forum strictly for countdowns?
  21. Because EB just wants to sell more expensive stuff.
  22. Bah, You're no Fun. quote: (No spoilers if you've heard this) Guess That means I must Abstain...
  23. quote: September 11th was NOT caused by Afghan or Islams, but by a group of malcontent, undeniably evil men under the cover of a religious cause The problem is this is where many of these Terrorists are hiding. quote: Why must the loss of lives be balanced by more loss of life? Unfortunatly, we are a violent species. The Bully on the play ground is only a bully until somebody gives them a bloody nose, and that is exactly what these terrorists are, and that is what we are doing. As far as understanding why they(the terrorists) want to do this... bin laden is angry at us for our occupation of his "Holy Land". Regardless of the fact that the US presence in Saudi is TOLERATED, and WANTED by the Saudi government. bin laden Blames US for events that happened before we were Born. quote: 4. civilian casualities=unacceptable, immoral occurrence associated with act of war (if done by a high-tech bully superpower) hehe, Well said Thantos. Civilian casualties are unfortunate. The only thing I have to add is If the U.S. were trying to kill Civilians the death count would be ALOT higher than it is alleged to be. Do accidents happen? Yes, and it is unfortunate. The only difference is we do NOT set out to target civilians, THEY intentionally did. And THAT is what changes a Freedom Fighter into a Terrorist - Hitting Military targets is one thing. Targeting Civilians is UNACCEPTABLE. Collateral Damage happens, it is something that you TRY to avoid, but no matter how hard you try, it is still going to happen.
  24. For Multiplayer the SC is intending on creating 2 different types of servers... Public servers(eg 16 players). Everybody welcome. The other server will be his Secure Fleet Access Server. With a max of I believe 32 Players. These servers will be open Only to players who are Registered in Fleets.
  25. hehe, it's gonna take a while to get to best buy stores... EB World has an exclusive deal.
×
×
  • Create New...