Yes ive seen it, thats why I made the comment
I assume im getting around 30-35fps
it does run smoothly for me, of course i did go into the nvidia display control panel and set my options to "best performance", disable verticle sync... etc... and it runs perfectly for me.
yeh a small loss of visual quality but not really noticable in most games.
Honestly i can run just about "ANYTHING" in 1024*768 16bit on this system,ad BCM fits in there perfectly.
Yes, it is time for an upgrade when I get some cash, but I havent yet come into a single game or program that would not run at acceptable speeds at 1024*768 for me.
So I dont know, maybe im just lucky and have some odd hardware configuration?
Something off the subject I would like to point out is how much performance difference in windows 98/ME/XP in comparrision to inside of linux, windows 95 (B), and nt 4(opengl), and well win2k...
in windows 95 b your framerates are VERY high compared to 98/ME/XP/2K, and in linux, well lets just say u cant compare the performance you get from running 3d games inside of that, its amazing.
if everyone still used windows 95 (or even nt 4) and microsoft didnt add useless bullshit to the operating system like the eye candy graphics effects, the integrated IE into taskbar thing, your performance would be alot better.
Why dont you try running windows 95 b (osr2) on your system, install updates and patches and compare the performance your getting right now to the performance in win95, besides win95 requires 8mb of ram, to run, what do the rest require? minimum of 64 to run efficiently, well xp requires 256 to run properly (from my experience)
That was just eating away at me, I had to get that out. sorry