You can find it over at Game Gossip
[ 02-23-2004, 08:41 AM: Message edited by: Supreme Cmdr ]
Game Gossip Interview
Started by Supreme Cmdr, Oct 03 2003 07:01 AM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 03 October 2003 - 07:01 AM
#2
Posted 03 October 2003 - 09:12 AM
good read. Glad to hear most of the changes will be fairly transparent to us BC'rs; Can't wait to get my hads on it.
#3
Posted 10 October 2003 - 04:40 AM
Nice. I´m looking forward to the release.
#7
Posted 14 October 2003 - 01:55 AM
Finally got a peek at that interview and went over to their site and got registered with the forum over there.
Used most of my sig from here, hope that's OK.
Had to grab my nick quick, before some other goofball grabbed it. LOL
Used most of my sig from here, hope that's OK.
Had to grab my nick quick, before some other goofball grabbed it. LOL
#8
Posted 14 October 2003 - 11:26 AM
[indent]quote:
Originally posted by Jaguar: ... went over to their site and got registered with the forum over there.
[/indent]One request, please. If you post anything important at that other forum, post it here too. Else it gets too confusing.
Unless, of course, the Battlecruiser search engine extends into other forums.
Originally posted by Jaguar: ... went over to their site and got registered with the forum over there.
[/indent]One request, please. If you post anything important at that other forum, post it here too. Else it gets too confusing.
Unless, of course, the Battlecruiser search engine extends into other forums.
#9
Posted 14 October 2003 - 12:26 PM
Anything I have to say that is important will be said over here.
I basically wanted my nick over there, so it wouldn't get stolen by someone, and to answer questions from the newbies that are there.
I don't often have anything important to say, so you probably wouldn't be missing much anyway. LOL
I basically wanted my nick over there, so it wouldn't get stolen by someone, and to answer questions from the newbies that are there.
I don't often have anything important to say, so you probably wouldn't be missing much anyway. LOL
#10
Posted 14 October 2003 - 12:44 PM
Originally posted by Supreme Commander:
[indent]quote:
Its not a carrier. Thats a type 12 station
[/indent]Well doh! ...guess that's a testament to just how far carriers, and well 'Space Carriers' have come! To think a carrier could be mistaken for a station and vice-versa! I suppose you could, in principle, think of a modern carrier as a virtual 'mobile-station'! Did you know that the world's first carrier was the british-built 1917 HMS Furious, although its often disputed that the US Navy were landing aircraft on ships many years earlier and in fact, well err, arr... I'll stop now
[indent]quote:
Its not a carrier. Thats a type 12 station
[/indent]Well doh! ...guess that's a testament to just how far carriers, and well 'Space Carriers' have come! To think a carrier could be mistaken for a station and vice-versa! I suppose you could, in principle, think of a modern carrier as a virtual 'mobile-station'! Did you know that the world's first carrier was the british-built 1917 HMS Furious, although its often disputed that the US Navy were landing aircraft on ships many years earlier and in fact, well err, arr... I'll stop now
#11
Posted 14 October 2003 - 07:48 PM
Don't stop, do carry on. When it comes to anything concerning history, aircraft, carriers, pac war, ships and so on, I'm all ears.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















