Jump to content


UCAWA Review - SciFi.com


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Supreme Cmdr

Supreme Cmdr

    Supreme Cmdr

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,734 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Florida
  • Interests:Keeping commanders in line!

Posted 08 September 2005 - 07:06 AM

http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue438/games.html

[ 01-21-2006, 12:43 AM: Message edited by: Supreme Cmdr ]

#2 Ben Zwycky

Ben Zwycky

    LT. Commander

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,838 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:nr Prague, Czech Republic
  • Interests:A christian, like juggling, languages (especially czech), most sports (esp. athl

Posted 08 September 2005 - 08:31 AM

Fair, balanced and helpful for those not in the know. Why can't all reviewers write like this?

#3 Darkling

Darkling

    Lieutenant

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 964 posts
  • Location:Coconut Creek
  • Interests:Computers, Hiking, Working out

Posted 08 September 2005 - 08:36 AM

quote:


Originally posted by Ben Zwycky:
Fair, balanced and helpful for those not in the know. Why can't all reviewers write like this?

Very true, great review. When will these guys realize that not all Gamers want the same "Shoot em til they die" Ad Nauseum.

#4 Psirat

Psirat

    Ensign

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 57 posts
  • Location:N. Waterboro, ME, USA
  • Interests:Sims and strategy, WWII, Esoterica, Modern War.

Posted 08 September 2005 - 08:47 AM

"... if learning to manipulate complex subsystems as its own reward excites you)."
Wait a minute! Is he calling us geeks? No one told me we were geeks!

I thought it was a fair review, overall (though I'm still playing UC *shame*).
I liked this part most of all:
"It's almost criminal that so much effort by an independent developer has gone into such an ambitious albeit flawed game, and that the end product costs less than a cheap dinner for two."
I don't believe there IS another simulation with the sheer number of man-hours that are behind this one.

#5 MarlboroMan

MarlboroMan

    Ensign

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
  • Location:Wisconsin

Posted 08 September 2005 - 08:53 AM

Nice review, and well earned. They forgot to mention your prompt tech support responses following a hurricane. The Microsoft comparison seems a little odd considering they might have a slightly bigger budget.


System Info
sys info

#6 Supreme Cmdr

Supreme Cmdr

    Supreme Cmdr

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,734 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Florida
  • Interests:Keeping commanders in line!

Posted 08 September 2005 - 11:55 AM

I disagree with the collision detect comment and sent him email about it explaining why it was disabled for vegetation and why it is listed in the FAQ.

So I have no idea what he meant by this, considering that if there was no general collision detect, first person would be unplayable (e.g. bullets won't hit etc)

quote:



Collision detection—a critical part of making first-person environments feel "real"—is still essentially absent,



#7 Darkling

Darkling

    Lieutenant

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 964 posts
  • Location:Coconut Creek
  • Interests:Computers, Hiking, Working out

Posted 08 September 2005 - 01:04 PM

quote:


Originally posted by Supreme Cmdr:
I disagree with the collision detect comment and sent him email about it explaining why it was disabled for vegetation and why it is listed in the FAQ.

So I have no idea what he meant by this, considering that if there was no general collision detect, first person would be unplayable (e.g. bullets won't hit etc)

quote:



Collision detection—a critical part of making first-person environments feel "real"—is still essentially absent,


This is true, I don't understand why so many people seem to gripe about this, it's the same for SWG and a whole host of other games. In very large environments such as this, to have collision detection enabled for Vegitation would require a super computer to run.

#8 teknocack

teknocack

    Ensign

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 331 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Happy Valley, OR, USA; PST (standard) = (GMT -8); PDT (daylight) = (GMT -7)
  • Interests:Gaming, outdoors, self development

Posted 08 September 2005 - 03:39 PM

Good review and well deserved. Won't say another thing.

#9 John Prezioso

John Prezioso

    Major

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,156 posts
  • Location:Memphis, TN
  • Interests:PC GAMES, musician

Posted 08 September 2005 - 10:56 PM

Wow! A fair review. Who woulda thunk it?

quote:


Wait a minute! Is he calling us geeks? No one told me we were geeks!

Uh, we thought you knew... sorry.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users