jamotto Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamotto Posted July 10, 2004 Author Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cc Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Yea, saw this on the news earlier tonight..err last night . [ 07-10-2004, 04:17 AM: Message edited by: Cc ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cc Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Yea, saw this on the news earlier tonight..err last night . [ 07-10-2004, 04:17 AM: Message edited by: Cc ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kartoffel Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 How unfortunate. It's going to be harder for Bush to prove that he was there, now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kartoffel Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 How unfortunate. It's going to be harder for Bush to prove that he was there, now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolferz Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 How, connnveeenient LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolferz Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 How, connnveeenient LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bandus Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Give it a rest. On second thougt, your right, it's all a conspiracy to cover Bush's tracks...he is so smart he destroyed the microfilm! I wonder if he snuck into the archives like Tom Cruise did in Mission Impossible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bandus Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Give it a rest. On second thougt, your right, it's all a conspiracy to cover Bush's tracks...he is so smart he destroyed the microfilm! I wonder if he snuck into the archives like Tom Cruise did in Mission Impossible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalshion Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 here's the bigger question How do you know if that article is even TRUTHFUL? Until I see proof (a video perhaps or something that shows someone destroying the records) I will treat this as liberal propaganda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalshion Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 here's the bigger question How do you know if that article is even TRUTHFUL? Until I see proof (a video perhaps or something that shows someone destroying the records) I will treat this as liberal propaganda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolferz Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 I have to wonder about those who wish to hide behind a shrubbery. The article could very well be true, who knows? The military is synonomous with the nomenclatures; FUBAR and SNAFU It just seems odd to me that stories like that seem to surface when it is most convenient for a Rankist's purposes. If you are in doubt as to the validity, then send a request to view those records yourselves and See what kind of response you get. Otherwise, put away your labelmaker and save it for labeling other things. Since I am neither liberal or conservative, it doesn't matter to me. The system is FUBAR from one end to the other and only boils down to two sides in competition with each other for the power of dominance over every citizen in this country. They get richer by making us poorer and I strongly feel that the so called honorable Mr Bush And his probable opponent are in on the fleecing of us all. My opinion on the service record of both candidates is that they are both highly suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolferz Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 I have to wonder about those who wish to hide behind a shrubbery. The article could very well be true, who knows? The military is synonomous with the nomenclatures; FUBAR and SNAFU It just seems odd to me that stories like that seem to surface when it is most convenient for a Rankist's purposes. If you are in doubt as to the validity, then send a request to view those records yourselves and See what kind of response you get. Otherwise, put away your labelmaker and save it for labeling other things. Since I am neither liberal or conservative, it doesn't matter to me. The system is FUBAR from one end to the other and only boils down to two sides in competition with each other for the power of dominance over every citizen in this country. They get richer by making us poorer and I strongly feel that the so called honorable Mr Bush And his probable opponent are in on the fleecing of us all. My opinion on the service record of both candidates is that they are both highly suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalshion Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Actually I just did my own research Military records are destroyed after 25-30 years after you either retire or are forced to leave That being said, the destruction of his records shouldn't be a surprise at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalshion Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 Actually I just did my own research Military records are destroyed after 25-30 years after you either retire or are forced to leave That being said, the destruction of his records shouldn't be a surprise at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now