Supreme Cmdr Posted September 18, 2003 Report Share Posted September 18, 2003 God, I hope someone gets fired - or at the very least, electrocuted, for this crap. Goddamn retards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever Light Posted September 18, 2003 Report Share Posted September 18, 2003 Userfriendly heh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cmdr Nova Posted September 18, 2003 Report Share Posted September 18, 2003 quote:Network administrators are fuming about changes made by domain registrar Verisign to the DNS system yesterday that they say violate longstanding Internet standards. Verisign yesterday added wildcard DNS records to all .com and .net domains - redirecting surfers who get lost on the Net to a search page, called Site Finder, run by the company. Those who type in non-existent addresses will also be served up Site Finder, instead of an error message. ROFLMAO. THEY F***ING OWN THE INTERNET PRACTICALLY. I had to check... www.vihyahzi.com redirects to http://sitefinder.verisign.com/lpc?url=www...ww.vihyahzi.com It's true. And so f***ing wrong. That's practically owning the internet. It's like, unfair advantage, or a monopoly of domain or something. Or, at the least, there's gonna be techincal problems down the road if their example is followed.... Good god, it is true. I had to check it again: www.joiaweheiughoaioawerjioerafgiowarjigopheajyukyugkygkugyukgykuoipbhwoairb.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Lindsey Posted September 18, 2003 Report Share Posted September 18, 2003 quote:It's true. And so f***ing wrong. That's practically owning the internet. It's like, unfair advantage, or a monopoly of domain or something.You mean sorta like Microsoft? quote:Or, at the least, there's gonna be techincal problems down the road if their example is followed....You mean sorta like Microsoft? Ok, ok that last was an unfair jab. NOBODY would follw Microsoft's example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epsilon 5 Posted September 18, 2003 Report Share Posted September 18, 2003 this is wrong, it's like claiming ownership of the internet by default. Despite that, the wildcard.com stuff doesn't work with me. Must have something to do with my location/ISP oh, and lookie what i found! That's like hanging adresses to people, hey, he forgot to renew and it was expired 10 seconds ago, it's yours! Like stealing the seat on the couch of someone while he goes to pee. Probably how it happened with www.orionfleet.com and www.theunderdogs.org ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cmdr Nova Posted September 18, 2003 Report Share Posted September 18, 2003 Bah. Pre-registering for an already existing domain has been going on forever. Network Solutions had a service like that before Verisign bought them out. All the domain registrars I look at have services like that. You know, I was actually thinking Microsoft when I said "unfair advantage...monopoly". lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Lindsey Posted September 18, 2003 Report Share Posted September 18, 2003 quote:You know, I was actually thinking Microsoft when I said "unfair advantage...monopoly". lol.Dammmit Nova ya ruined a perfectly good troll. Heheheh. Aw heck let em battle it out. I'll take the scraps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREG MILLER Posted September 18, 2003 Report Share Posted September 18, 2003 Did they not think this was bad to begin with??? I mean now since any domain will now resolve to something, the easiest SPAM check for ISP's is now down the drain. They can nolonger check to make sure a mail sending domain is valid or not, because they now are all valid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREG MILLER Posted September 19, 2003 Report Share Posted September 19, 2003 Here come the lawyers!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epsilon 5 Posted September 19, 2003 Report Share Posted September 19, 2003 shame on me, but I'm happy about the lawyers coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supreme Cmdr Posted September 19, 2003 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Epsilon 5: shame on me, but I'm happy about the lawyers coming Yeah, me too. I hope they take them to the cleaners. F*ckers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREG MILLER Posted September 21, 2003 Report Share Posted September 21, 2003 Now the enforcers are getting in the act!!! Hopefully this fiasco should be ended soon. We can only hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREG MILLER Posted October 2, 2003 Report Share Posted October 2, 2003 Sudhian (formerly Via Hardware) has a very good editoral on Veriscum. Has the DOD gone mad???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostInSpace Posted October 2, 2003 Report Share Posted October 2, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Greg Miller: Has the DOD gone mad???? In my opinion, I think the whole world has gone mad. My pitiful kingdom for a star ship so I can blow (as in leave) this rock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huwie Posted October 6, 2003 Report Share Posted October 6, 2003 Looks like it's all over, for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grayfox Posted October 6, 2003 Report Share Posted October 6, 2003 quote:Schu stressed that several layers of security will prevent hackers from accessing the system. rrrrrrriiiiiiggggghhhhht. for some reason i find that hard to believe... i mean if hackers can hack into the FBI... i dunno, youre the security guru SC what do you think? is anything "hack-proof"??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supreme Cmdr Posted October 6, 2003 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Grayfox: i dunno, youre the security guru SC what do you think? is anything "hack-proof"??? There's no such thing as hack proof. Also, the medium responsible for the security of sites, is a human (not a Gammulan, sadly enough), so they are prone to mistakes. If a hacker breaks into the FBI, its not the hardware/software that is responsible - but rather the implementation and configuration of same. Just ask Valve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREG MILLER Posted October 16, 2003 Report Share Posted October 16, 2003 These people are Greedy FREAKIN Morons!!!! Nobody I know wants this service turned back on. Do You??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grayfox Posted October 16, 2003 Report Share Posted October 16, 2003 quote:But Gomes and Larson, under intense questioning from ICANN committee members, refused to release details about the methodology of the survey such as the questions asked and the responses received. "The actual feedback we got directly from doing the survey is proprietary information," Larson said. in laymans terms, theyre blowing smoke up our arses. propietary info my a$$... they use that excuse so no one can right out say that theyre lying. all about the benjamins... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now