Charles Lindsey Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 We almost need a stocks, bonds, and 401k thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Shingen Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 quote:Originally posted by Jaguar: Actually, the stockmarket goes UP whenever Bush is up in the polls, and goes DOWN whenever Kerry is up in the polls. So, the exact opposite is actually true. If the stock market crashes because someone wins the election, it will because Kerry wins the election. BUT, it won't crash, it will drop a few hundred points if Kerry wins, and go up a few hundred points if Bush wins. Woopdeedoo Well actually, the market performs pretty much consistently no matter who is in office. You just have to be smart enough, and brave enough to learn the nuances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalshion Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 401k? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamotto Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 quote:Originally posted by Kalshion: 401k?What is a 401k plan? Here Is A Quick Overview Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostInSpace Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 I found this quite interesting Let's have another miracle to save marriage and our families Mary Mostert July 15, 2004 Yesterday on a cloture motion on the Federal Marriage act, 48 U.S. Senators voted "Yes" on the bill and 50 voted "No" to not even allow a vote on whether or not marriage meant the union between one man and one woman. The two senators who did not think this issue was even sufficiently important to show up to vote were Democrats John Kerry of Massachusetts and his running mate, John Edwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grizzle Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 They are kinda busy with a Presidential campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matchoo Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 quote:Originally posted by Grizzle: They are kinda busy with a Presidential campaign. Still doesn't mean they can't do the job that they were elected to do. If they aren't going to fulfill all their responsabilities as senators, how can we trust them to fulfill all their duties if they become president? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 President Bush and VP Cheney are sill doing thier jobs, what are Edwards and Kerry's excuse? Bush and Cheney are still "Busy with a presidential election" as well. I am still wondering why Kerry does not resign his sentate seat like Dole did during his campaign. The is Edwards last shot at public office, if he doesn't win the VP slot, he's finished, because his state will NOT reelect him Dog Catcher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grizzle Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 It happens all the time when senators run for election, this is NOT news to anyone. I'm not saying it's excusable, but Kerry and Edwards aren't the first. As for fulfilling duties even the President is required to make appearances in public (like reading to school children), doesn't that take away from his job? I know I know, it's part of his job, but it shouldn't be in my opinion. The whole topic is a straw man argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
street228 Posted October 6, 2004 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 quote:President Bush and VP Cheney are sill doing thier jobs, yeah, just like they have been doing for the past 4 years... I would just like to know when Bush's JOB title, included, TERRORISING the american public with LIES and misrepresentation of facts and creating division throughout this country, unequaled since the civil war. Since when, is the President, doing his job, in declaration of war on 3rd world powers, who have no ability to defend themselves, and INVADING 3rd world countries... who NEVER attacked the UNITED STATES? go ahead and explain your ideas, I promise, I will not even offer a rebuttle toward your lame "bush propaghanda" disputes. Why? because, there is NO JUSTIFICATION, nor is there a LIE you or bush can concieve, which would relieve Him, or his supporters, of the responsibility and the BLOOD upon their hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 quote:Originally posted by street: quote:President Bush and VP Cheney are sill doing thier jobs, yeah, just like they have been doing for the past 4 years... I would just like to know when Bush's JOB title, included, TERRORISING the american public with LIES and misrepresentation of facts and creating division throughout this country, unequaled since the civil war. Since when, is the President, doing his job, in declaration of war on 3rd world powers, who have no ability to defend themselves, and INVADING 3rd world countries... who NEVER attacked the UNITED STATES? go ahead and explain your ideas, I promise, I will not even offer a rebuttle toward your lame "bush propaghanda" disputes. Why? because, there is NO JUSTIFICATION, nor is there a LIE you or bush can concieve, which would relieve Him, or his supporters, of the responsibility and the BLOOD upon their hands. I see a LOT of rhetoric, but NO facts. Poor Street, still believing the lies as truth, and the truth as lies. Ahh, 1984, that must be where you live..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
street228 Posted October 6, 2004 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 You continue to call my observations Rhetoric, how confused you must be to your own opinions, you call facts? what a twisted moron Here are some MORE facts, as to what a LIAR you continue to represent: Meeting Was Not First for Cheney, Edwards By LIZ SIDOTI CLEVELAND (AP) - Vice President Dick Cheney said Tuesday night that the debate with Democratic Sen. John Edwards marked the first time they had met. In fact, the two had met at least three times previously. Cheney made the remark while accusing Edwards of frequent absences from Senate votes. ``Now, in my capacity as vice president, I am the president of Senate, the presiding officer. I'm up in the Senate most Tuesdays when they're in session. The first time I ever met you was when you walked on the stage tonight,'' Cheney told Edwards during the debate. On Feb. 1, 2001, the vice president thanked Edwards by name at a Senate prayer breakfast and sat beside him during the event. On April 8, 2001, Cheney and Edwards shook hands when they met off-camera during a taping of NBC's ``Meet the Press,'' moderator Tim Russert said Wednesday on ``Today.'' On Jan. 8, 2003, the two met when the first-term North Carolina senator accompanied Elizabeth Dole to her swearing-in by Cheney as a North Carolina senator, Edwards aides also said. Edwards didn't forget their prayer-breakfast meeting. The Democratic vice presidential candidate noted the discrepancy at a post-debate rally in a Cleveland park, calling it an example of Cheney ``still not being straight with the American people.'' ``The vice president said that the first time I met Senator Edwards was tonight when we walked on the stage. I guess he forgot the time we sat next to each other for a couple hours about three years ago. I guess he forgot the time we met at the swearing in of another senator. So, my wife Elizabeth reminded him on the stage,'' Edwards said as the crowd roared. According to Edwards' staff, Cheney replied, ``Oh, yeah.'' ``She reminded him about the truth,'' Edwards told the crowd, ``and come November, we're going to remind him that the American people do not want four more years of George W. Bush.'' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrismoney7 Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 There is this too: U.S. Report Finds No Evidence of Iraq WMD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalshion Posted October 7, 2004 Report Share Posted October 7, 2004 Again, though Bunny. New's agencys cannot be trusted anymore ABC NBC CBS MSNBC CNN And in some case's, Fox News (because they report what they get, and most of it come's from the Asscioated Propaganda) There for, the only really reliable source of information come's from the troops who are IN iraq, OR from the FN reporters My sister just got BACK from iraq (her 2nd time there since the beginning of the war) and she told me that they had a large amount of paper work for something that was discovered in Iraq.. however she wasn't allowed to tell me more than that. Could be anything really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now