Guest Posted May 16, 2001 Report Posted May 16, 2001 SC gave me permission to post these, so, go take look and tell him what you think!! and tell me what you think, tossed it together in about 45 minutes!! http://home.earthlink.net/~rpasquier
Guest Posted May 16, 2001 Report Posted May 16, 2001 "OK, simple little webpage that doesn't come even close to doing this thing Justice"Works for me =)Nice job SC!
Emmett.hendrick Posted May 16, 2001 Report Posted May 16, 2001 Talk about take my breath away, those shots are georgeus(spelling?) SC and the team are doing a GREAT job.
Epsilon 5 Posted May 16, 2001 Report Posted May 16, 2001 Jaw on the floor You can dive!?! Can you shoot underwater?
GREG MILLER Posted May 16, 2001 Report Posted May 16, 2001 I've fallen on the floor and I can't get up!
Supreme Cmdr Posted May 16, 2001 Report Posted May 16, 2001 hehe, I keep telling everybody, shots do NOT do the game justice. At all.And he was only able to take that craft underwater because I have not yet enabled the water title detection yet. btw, that shot of the station against the planet backdrop, was taken using the standard F10 camera which has a fixed pos around the target.To see the true size of the station against Earth, you'd need to target the planet, rotate it up close until you see the station in orbit, then zoom out. The station, compared to the planet, is but a speck and is NOT visible to the naked eye.Here are the dimensions:station: 12.5km (H) x 28km (W) x 28km (L)planet: 12756km diameterThe planet is about 455x the size of the station, depending on how you do the math.While you're doing *that* math...think about this, Jupiter is 142796km in diameter'nuff said
Guest Commander 598 Posted May 17, 2001 Report Posted May 17, 2001 So your saying that normal space craft will not be able to go underwater?
Tyrn Posted May 17, 2001 Report Posted May 17, 2001 quote:Originally posted by Commander 598: So your saying that normal space craft will not be able to go underwater?LOL...that's why they're space craft and yes that might have other implications but then again it might not [ 05-17-2001: Message edited by: Tyrn ]
GREG MILLER Posted May 18, 2001 Report Posted May 18, 2001 'Cmon now, did you really think the SC was going to let us blow up that new D.S.V. so easily???
Guest Commander 598 Posted May 18, 2001 Report Posted May 18, 2001 I was worried for a second. I read somewhere about being able to...Somewhere...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now