Jump to content

Cmdr Jeffery Eu

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


Posts posted by Cmdr Jeffery Eu

  1. quote:

    Rico Jansen posted on 11-19-2001

    Who said that? If Jeffery and his merc gang are going to stick their hands into a beehive, guess who's comming to the rescue. Not us! You want trouble, you lick your wounds yourself. Tip: You're missing a paramedic division.

    If Rattler and his gang, or some raider bunch decides to pay our territory a visit, they'll know we will be there. But nobody ever said Guns For Hire Inc. is pulling a contract out of that (magician hat ).

    Nope, we're not missing a paramedics division, is just that there's no one to head it at the moment. If you're talking about the organisational chart at our web site, yeah, Riga missed out a few divisions.

    Fair enough, on a general basis, mercs will not stick their hands into the proverbial beehive for fun, as there no money to it, but I'm sure you'll agree that we're attacked while on an trader escort mission, you will respond to our SOS, right?

    I never said that it would be easy, but then you never know when we're needed right? Someday you might end up somewhere without backup, that's when we're there to offer our services.

  2. quote:

    Rico Jansen posted on 11-19-2001

    2/3/10: Sounds like an infringement of their freedom if you ask me. If they like that, fine by me. If they don't, fleets are just as interesting, if not safer. Care to explain otherwise? But I mention this because it is neccessary in relation to the quotes below.

    6/7/8: I see no need for this piramid 'scheme' to be of any use to either the members or staff of the division. Apperentice (though I seriously believe "Apprentice" is the right spelling) is crazy if he 'donates' 50% of his deal to his uppers. What's he getting in return. The Executioner won't know what to do with that money. (I'd love to be his bankaccount manager. Half of Shadow Inc.'s revenue is stockpilling there.) And Grandmasters, ... oh well, I already shared my views on this un-transparent money flow scheme. Which goes for all of Intercorps subsidaries. 'Directors' just decide and sign the contracts. Any costs for the corp are payed by the corp itself, by means of the accountancy department. Sure if you say the director holds the division's bank account, then it's ok. But that still makes the intermediate cashflow stages like Masters and Executioners (and all other caste equivalents) obsolete. Just make sure all members deposit their fees into that account. Safer too. No mid-level manager that runs away with it. They can get a daily/monthly allowance and/or run the errands (contracts) themselves, IMO.

    As I mention in my previous post, this charter was posted by me as submitted by the Shadow Inc. director who wishes to remain incognito. Yes, we realise that there is a direct contradiction to the Intercorp charters. As I have also mentioned amendments are on the way, but I'll leave that to the Shadow Inc.'s director. Appreciate your comments.


    Rico Jansen posted on 11-19-2001

    1: And we (I think I can speek for all the fleets) have no objection incase Intercorp changes her mind on this. IOW, that's your (Intercorp and gang) decision. Not something we have to agree on.

    2. Intercorp as a whole? Or any of it's parts? If the latter, then tell me how rules 2/3/10 of the first quote DO NOT contradict to that. Like Shingen, I think your saying one thing and then the opposite, and then that we don't get it. No, we don't. Get it yourself?

    3. Seems natural. A charter for Shadow Inc. is not for Guns For Hire Inc. if they have their own set out.

    4. I don't think you were slamming him, but see number 2 above. You are just butting heads.

    5. Hey, we're in OUR business too. And guess what goes when war/martial law is at hand. The Military Way! And read my remarks at 1 again. Those are Intercorp's personal restrictions, not ours.

    6. Gearing up? Don't grind your teeth when changing from neutral into 2nd.

    1. Weeeeelll, we're not actually asking for your agreement, we're telling what we're doing which is only polite. Sorry if you don't like it, but you can't have everything.

    2. Please see above.

    3. Glad you agree, I just mentioned that to inform you guys that all the charters were created from the prespective of the respective castes, so if you have any queries, ask the respective Directors, I'm just helping out by posting them.

    4. I agree.

    5. Read my previous post.

    6. We were on full swing from the get go, so there's no more changing of gears

    [ 11-19-2001: Message edited by: Cmdr Jeffery Eu ]

  3. Welcome back Riga, as you can see, I've been holding the fort Any news from Director 3?

    Great update to the site BTW you spelled El Dorado Inc wrongly, its 2 words not 1 and you forgot to include the Raider Division.

    RL must be busy so take yoru time

    [ 11-19-2001: Message edited by: Cmdr Jeffery Eu ]

  4. quote:

    Rosko posted on 11-19-2001

    Now I understand, that respect in this forum, is not from who I'am as a person, but how big the number is next to my post count!! With my theory in mind, I give up, I'll just let this blow away. A missed opportunity for an extra spin and extra option too the new recruits, for the RPG threads and MP game universe. Sure, in the future there will be a Credian Military, but for now the community is to scared to experiment, with fresh blood...!!

    Rosko, you're taking this all wrong, what DeSylva is saying that is mainly this, watch what you are typing, it doesn't hurt to take an extra minute to make sure that your spelling is right.

    If you want to start a Credian fleet, good luck to you, but you have to set an example to your fellow Credians, and what the other guys are just trying to do is to make sure that you are up to the responsibility of being a role model.

    This defeatist attitude will get you nowhere at all and I beg to differ, I know that respect on this board is garnered through your accomplishments and your attitude not the number of posts you have.

    Hang tight, and try to learn not to take it too personal. I know I started Intercorp and if you want to how I reacted to comments from the others than go read up the Organisation thread. Stay cool.

    See you around

    [ 11-19-2001: Message edited by: Cmdr Jeffery Eu ]

  5. quote:

    Remo Williams posted on 11-18-2001

    I don't think were threating you as much as trying to make our position clear. Some of us want Intercorp to be able to use military stations in the terran quadrant as launch bases. It will be better for your business and ours, but if anything goes. We won't be able to turn our backs on it now will we.

    I might have interpreted the posts wrongly, if I did I apologize. And seriously, I understand what you are worried about.

    Due to the nature of UCVs and Intercorp's intention of not binding the common members to rules and regulations, I wish to propose the following compromise:-

    1. That Intercorp will not be held responsible to any actions by common members;

    2. That Intercorp will be held responsible by any actions of all the Intercorp office bearers.

    I think this would be fairer.

  6. I would like to get this clear to anyone having an interest Intercorp.

    1. We will not discriminate against any race or caste;

    2. Members with the exception of office bearers are NOT bound by any of the rules and regulations of Intercorp;

    3. The Charters are drawn up by the respective Directors without any additions from the other Directors, which means that the Charters are drawn from the point of view for the specific caste that the Charter addresses to;

    4. We really, really would appreciate comments and suggestions from anyone, contrary to Shingen's feeling that we're slamming him;

    5. I would really appreciate it if you fleeters could stop threatening the Corporation or its members, we're in business, so anything goes. Don't expect everyone of our members to conform to your rigid wants and needs which would be contrary to rules 1 and 2;

    6. Remember the fleeters might be gearing up for just MP but we're gearing up towards GCO.

  7. quote:

    Shigen posted on 11-17-2001

    Well that's sort of an oxymoron then ain't it On one hand it says that a member has to follow UNCONDITIONALLY, then you say NO ONE has to follow ANYTHING... so, which is it?

    It is not an oxymoron, if you read the Corporation's charter really, really carefully, and the charters for all the other divisions you will see that we adhere to the idea that NO ONE is bound by the rules and regulations of the Corporation with the single exception of office bearers due to the numerous perks they are entitled to.

    This is what I meant by constructive suggestions and we do take it into account, amendments to the charter will be submitted soon.


    Shingen posted on 11-17-2001

    Again, if you can't take constructive criticism, then move to a private forum... and I WASN'T trying to be negative at all, just CLEAR, so you can remove the chip from your shoulder.

    and.. yea, I probably wouldn't want to join anywayz.... but I'm still part of this community, so until the SC kicks me off, I'll reply where I want.

    I can take criticism and you will see this if you have read this thread carefully, what I can not stand is unilateral announcements and statements that have no basis in fact which will not happen if you have read this thread carefully

    I have always posted that I am willing to listen to any suggestions and comments from anyone, but you are not helping matters by dishing us without any suggestions or recommendations.

    BTW for your information, we're not trying to stop you from posting, we're trying to get you to tell us what your objection is.....see above

    Anyway, if you don't like us or the idea of a corporation with rules then ignore us, as Baloogan says "so simple"

    Seriously I would appreciate any suggestions or comments from anyone to help us improve the Corporation in any way, however just saying you don't like it does not tell us anything, tell us what you like or what you don't like. Remember, we're only human and we make mistakes too, especially the rule that you have so much objection with.

    [ 11-18-2001: Message edited by: Cmdr Jeffery Eu ]

  8. quote:

    TRD posted on 11-16-2001

    Sorry I havent posted for a while, Uni is pissing me off at the moment.

    I got your email Jeff, the new layout looks good. Can you send any new messages to [email protected], its easier for me to check.

    Also since our numbers are pretty low, do you think we should create a recruitment thread

    No problemo. BTW we are actively recruiting, as we're not militaristic in nature, there's no point putting up a recruitment thread.

    IMHO as there's no glamour in joining Intercorp as all we have to offer is discounts and general fellowship, while the military can offer big ships and big guns and exciting assignments, so we should just confine our recruiting to the couple of threads devoted to Intercorp.

  9. quote:

    Baloogan posted on 11-16-2001

    Man can i join intercorp as,,, PR,,, HR or something that ends with R, AR, BR, CR... HR or PR.

    Baloogan you're already part of Intercorp, the day you first offered to put up our web site, it's just that since there's only a few of us, no one other than the Directors have been given positions of authority, if you really want a position email me and we'll talk ok?

  10. quote:

    Outlaw posted on 11-16-2001

    U know its funny, before I quit Intercorp I was very surprised of why I was member when U knew I was a Gammulan. Think twice if u think about placing a bounty on my head. U wouldn't want to lose a lot of members against a stormcarrier strike fleet.

    Intercorp DOES NOT AND WILL NOT DISCRIMATE against any race or caste, so if you are Gammulan mercenary and wants to join, we'll accept you, if you are a down and out Vesperion assassin, we will accept you, there are no exceptions.

    If there's a bounty on your head and some Intercorp member accepts it, its he or her own head on the line....don't take it personal it's a job, a dirty job, but someone has to do it

  11. quote:

    Shingen posted on 11-16-2001

    Unconditonally sounds more like a dictatorship then an organization... why would I want to forsake my own INDEPENDENT status to follow someone UNCONDITIONALLY? Come on man.. get real.

    As far as I'm concerned NO ONE needs to follow anything, if you don't like it, don't join, or better yet propose a better charter


    Shingen posted on 11-16-2001

    Again I ask you, What's the point of BEING independent if I have to ask someone else which jobs I can or can't take?! If I wanted to lose that much control over my own actions, then I'd just join a fleet and have them micro-manage me...

    I think a better use of a corporation would be akin to an employment service, where the corporation would go out and FIND the jobs, keep a working list of availialbe mercs, then contract those jobs out for a percentage of the profits. That way indies DON'T lose their independence, (they can take whatever jobs they want), and the corp makes a profit through the indies.

    I don't know what your problem is, I repeat if you don't like if then don't join That's the beauty of being UCV.

    As far as I know the response to nearly all the proposed charters were positive. Its seems like you and only you have objections, please be a bit more constructive and give us your suggestions, if not, then keep quiet please.

  12. quote:

    Badgerius posted on 11-16-2001

    I shouldn't be surprised, but you're going to deal with competition by assassinating them? You'll have your hands full, as all of the newbies avoid joining to escape the 50% tithe...

    But it makes my job easier, since I know who's responsible for any assassination, don't I? I may not know your names, but I know where your stations are...

    First off the charter was submitted by me as submitted by the unnamed Director as he/she wishes to retain his/her anonymity.

    Secondly, the main reason we put up the charters here is for comments and suggestions.

    Thirdly, you may know where their bases are but do you know where they are? That's when you guys pay us (i.e. The Explorers Division) to locate the b*****d that took a pot shot at you...

  13. Shadow Inc.

    The Assassin Division for Intercorp Unlimited

    1. That the members of Shadow Inc. will be separated into four designations, Grandmasters, Masters, Executioner and Apperentices;

    2. That all members shall obey the orders unconditionally of their senior in Shadow Inc.;

    3. That prior to all assignments undertaken by Apperentice members of Shadow Inc.,members must request permission from a senior member;

    4. That an Apperentice member shall be promoted into a Executioner member after the completion of 20 paid missions and the approval of a Master member;

    5. That an Executioner member shall only be promoted into a Master by the permision of a Grandmaster;

    6. That an Apperentice member shall pay his/her Master 50% of his/her profits;

    7. That an Executioner shall pay his/her Master 10% of his/her profits;

    8. That a Master member shall pay the Grandmasters 10% of his/her profits;

    9. That any unauthorized Assassins/assassinations will be dealt with in a harsh manner;

    10. That members of Shadow Inc. must obey the commands of the directors of Intercorp;

    11. That assassinations of any members within Intercorp are strictly forbidden and will result in expulsion and ultimately execution;

    12. That members of Shadow Inc. must receive a retainer deposit of at least 30% of the contracted amount before undertaking an assignment;


    After a long draught of news from the Intercorp corporation, a spokesman just release this:-

    We have been in deep discussions and we're are proud to release another charter to the public. This charter belongs to the assassins Division, aptly known as SHADOW INC

    We will not be releasing the names of the directors or the members as it is of confidential nature due to the nature of the profession.

    The charter may be perused here.


    [ 11-16-2001: Message edited by: Cmdr Jeffery Eu ]

  15. quote:

    Remo Williams posted on 11-15-2001

    Will see if you feel that way when a group of raiders are about to put some IOD fire up the tail pipe of your unarmed transport and you spot a GALCOM patrol near by.

    Ahem, that's why there are mercs for hire right? Anyway having a military is really good, as we get free protection within the respective fleet's jurisdictions and also unlimited firepower and reinforcements

    The motto of this story is Never ever burn your bridges, you might need it later

  • Create New...