Jump to content

BC_Vet

Members
  • Posts

    62
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Profile Information

  • Location
    Earth/Sol

BC_Vet's Achievements

Ensign

Ensign (1/8)

  1. Is this scenario limited to fleet members only? I've played it a couple of times already.
  2. TDH seemed like a good corp to me...but that corp died because no one wanted to play MP... Intercorp died before UC was released. [ 08-23-2007, 09:54 PM: Message edited by: BC_Vet ]
  3. Curious.. Jag hasn't replied yet. Inquiring minds....
  4. hehe ROFL!! More proof that these "vets" of this game, prolly don't ever freakin PLAY this game. Obviously my reply was self-evident, so either you didn't read it, or u ain't never been there. The beauty of this game is that u can play forever and never see what I've seen or did what I've done. There r no vets in BC...only people that have played this game forever.
  5. quote:Originally posted by Quazar: Today, the situation is kind of how it was in May 2004 (when MP really got going in earnest), and that's this: Fleets need players. To attract and keep them, Fleets should undertake periodic MP, RP or both, as their members see fit. It's really that simple. If you can't afford the time to play online as much as you would like, that's fine. Really it is! [smile] We want you to take part in the action - no matter how sporadic your participation, or our scheduled events may be - because you being there makes it more fun for the rest of us.Why isn't there any mention the the indie fleet started by Shingen? I've read most of the indie forum and why aren't they also part of the fleet history? It seems he was able to to enlist the same amount of members as the rest...and were active within Fleet MP more then most, but no mention of "TDH". True there was some sort of conflict between parties, but does that negate the history? No, I'm not trolling..just asking. However, in the final assessment, I would have to conclude that there is no active Gammulan leadership. Chavik, Sho, u need anyone in your fleet? I'd rather be indie or Gammulan, but there isn't much point. Thank u all for you replies. Knowledge is Power.
  6. Anyway.. I'd be happy to join a Gammulan fleet, and participate in regular fleet activities, if there is some sort of active leadership. If Gammulans have to report to some GalCom leadership, then I ain't interested... as it blows the whole mythos. If needs be I can provide a domain and website for the fleet.
  7. quote:Originally posted by Remo Williams: The person with the answer to your question is Shohashi I'm sure he'll speakup soon enough patience. These guys care believe me you don't stick around for as long as they have and not care. Yeah well if I didn't care i wouldn't be here either.. just cause I got a 2007 account don't make me a freakin' newbie POS. Good ta see ya Remo.
  8. REMO!! Hell yeah. From the horses mouth to God's ear.
  9. u know.. for what it's worth..never mind. Obviously no one has an answer, nor cares anyway... Sad.. Gammulans deserved better...
  10. quote:Originally posted by Kalshion: What is it you don't understand?Why no Gammulan leadership in either RP or MP? I thought the topic was self-evident. What part didn't u get? It's just a conversation, dude. Aren't you following along here? C'Mon it can't be that hard. UC MP started in and around May of 2004. Roughly. Since 2004, how many times did the current Gammulan fleet participate in RP or MP. Answer? None. Not Once. Look. I came here to inquire about the Gammulan fleet, but if I am to be a crucible..so be it. Execute me, ban me, condemn me and be done with it. The truth and the question remain: Who controls the Gammulan Fleet?
  11. Nothing. I was off-topic in that forum and was corrected. Now we are on the same page..yes? Aren't you following this whole drama? Please read above. I could quote if u like.
  12. Thank u.. aramike. I agree whole-heartedly. However.. the topic at hand remains. Truthfully, if the community cannot tolerate inquiry then something needs to be re-evaluated.
  13. OK..sue me.. I'm curious... quote:Originally posted by Jaguar: quote:Originally posted by BC_Vet: My apologies..but some things need to be asked. In their proper places, and this was and is not the proper place. You want to raise caine about the Gammulan fleet, take it to the gammulan fleet forum and we will discuss it, although, you may not like what I have to say about it. LOL I'll bite. Why no Gammulan leadership in either RP or MP? But this CAN NOT be a banning offense. Free and open discussion or none at all. If we can't be civil I don't wanna play
  14. I stand corrected. My apologies..I simply posted what was perviously stated. I had no idea that there was a vast web of politics behind it all.
  15. quote:Originally posted by Kalshion: Because its a requirement to join any offical fleet? You have to register in the database, there is no reason to argue it.Please read my above post. I wasn't making an accusation..but asking a question. What purpose is applying to a database without active fleet leadership? I was informed that THERE WAS NO ACTIVE LEADERSHIP. quote: Thats correct: The SC stated that only the current version of his games have MP, meaning you won't find servers for older versions of UC, just the newer version. And no, as far as I can tell, fleets were never intended to be an advertising vehicle, as you so put it, they are intended as a place for people to get together and take part in fleet matches or roleplays.Again, please re-read my above post. I simply stated that in order to PARTICIPATE in any sort of Fleet Action scenario, one needed an updated version of the latest UC. Which would completely EXCLUDE anyone with an earlier copy of the same game. Ben has solved this (at least to UC 2.00.30), but again I WAS JUST ASKING. I appreciate ur comments, but they seem rather hostile, and I can't fathom why. Perhaps it's just me.
×
×
  • Create New...