I have yet to see such a detailed review for any of my games. Ignore the score which I don't think is in line with the review text, but its a well written review and you can tell that the reviewer actually spent a LOT of time with the game instead of rushing through it like most others.
UCSE Review - GameShark
Started by Supreme Cmdr, Dec 02 2006 05:56 AM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 02 December 2006 - 05:56 AM
#2
Posted 02 December 2006 - 08:34 AM
A very detailed review indeed.
It could have been better if the reviewer hadn't spent so much verbage on his wish list.
It could have been better if the reviewer hadn't spent so much verbage on his wish list.
#3
Posted 02 December 2006 - 01:58 PM
Good review.
Some of his criticisms of the game weren't valid, but were understandable considering he only played it for 'about 5 hours', so he is definitely not going to be able to play the game properly after that much time with it.
The one suggestion he had that I thought would be excellent is dual-monitor support. This would greatly add to the playability of the game I believe.
Cheers,
Some of his criticisms of the game weren't valid, but were understandable considering he only played it for 'about 5 hours', so he is definitely not going to be able to play the game properly after that much time with it.
The one suggestion he had that I thought would be excellent is dual-monitor support. This would greatly add to the playability of the game I believe.
Cheers,
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















