3000AD Inc Publishing Deal
#1
Posted 19 December 2002 - 10:59 AM
#2
Posted 19 December 2002 - 11:03 AM
#3
Posted 19 December 2002 - 11:30 AM
Originally posted by Kiran:
Dude, those last couple of questions are kinda scary....don't do anything rash, now.
[/indent]LOL!!! Don't worry, its all in good fun because I know some folks are just thinking like those responses. I know I would.
#4
Posted 19 December 2002 - 11:48 AM
#5
Posted 19 December 2002 - 11:51 AM
ANyway, I can't wait to see the official press release and get the full details. This'll be interesting.
#6
Posted 19 December 2002 - 12:04 PM
(I've played one good console game... ONE!!)
#7
Posted 19 December 2002 - 12:33 PM
#8
Posted 19 December 2002 - 01:07 PM
#9
Posted 19 December 2002 - 01:44 PM
Each time I see one of my coworkers at work I'm always arguing why PCs are better than consoles ... and he's arguing the other way around.
#10
Posted 19 December 2002 - 01:59 PM
There's nothing wrong with PC gaming, it's just the fact that I'm not so much a PC gamer, than a consoler. (I was born and raised living by the NES and SNES.)
I say both are completely good, in their own respects.
I used to be all for PC gaming, only because of multiplayer. But with the next generation of console games out there, that advantage is out.
I share the same view on this as most of the other teens in my area, more or less. Consoles are for gaming. Computers are for the internet, chat, instant messaging, big online games, and basically every other feature you need to get actual work done.
I'm not an obsessive-compulsive gamer. (I have a friend who is.) I'm simply a gaming fan. Either way, I don't care about the console vs. PC war. If SC said he'd go all out console from now on, I wouldn't care as much as everyone else (I'd probably care, because of the thought of a final BC game on the PC). If he said he'd do all PC games and never try out the console, I wouldn't really care; that'd be his loss.
There is no argument between console and PC. The average PC gamer is just simply brainier. But that never bothered me. I've always had some sort of love for consoles. Always.
It's basically comparing Windows to Linux, or PHP to BASIC, or Windows Media Player to Winamp. Simpler was almost always better. Less ways to screw things up and complicate things. But both things cater to different tastes. So there's no real good or bad, it's just bias and propaganda.
[ 12-19-2002, 02:00 PM: Message edited by: Cmdr Nova ]
#11
Posted 19 December 2002 - 03:31 PM
I'm not against consoles (in fact between my bro and I we own all the next-gen systems). I'm just against BC on consoles. I think it'd lose a lot in the translation.
#12
Posted 19 December 2002 - 06:08 PM
#13
Posted 19 December 2002 - 06:24 PM
[ 12-19-2002, 06:25 PM: Message edited by: Viper2000 ]
#14
Posted 19 December 2002 - 06:40 PM
Originally posted by Viper2000:
I thought your sig said enough on your feelings about doing deals with publishers
[/indent]It sure does. So the sig stays.
#15
Posted 19 December 2002 - 06:54 PM
#16
Posted 19 December 2002 - 06:55 PM
I saw T2 as a choice, couldn't resist the ...
TTFN
#17
Posted 19 December 2002 - 06:58 PM
Originally posted by Serondal:
However it would be really nice to see a BC game on the X-Box
[/indent]No games in the scope and vein of the traditional high-end complicated Battlecruiser series, are planned for the XBox.
The XBox game (working title, GCE) is not a Battlecruiser title. Anyone thinking that I'd be crazy enough to attempt something of that scope on the XBox - or any console for that matter - is far crazier than I am.
[ 12-19-2002, 06:58 PM: Message edited by: Supreme Cmdr ]
#18
Posted 19 December 2002 - 07:14 PM
#19
Posted 19 December 2002 - 07:30 PM
#20
Posted 19 December 2002 - 07:32 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















