Jump to content

Who would you vote for?


Guest $iLk
 Share

Recommended Posts

It is time to elect the world leader, and your vote counts. Here are the facts about the three leading candidates:

Candidate A - Associates with crooked politicians, consults with astrologists. Has had two mistresses. He also chain smokes and drinks 8 - 10 martinis a day.

-------------------------------------

Candidate B - He was kicked out of office twice, sleeps until noon,used opium in college, and drinks a quart of whiskey every evening.

-------------------------------------

Candidate C - He is a decorated war hero, a vegetarian, doesn't smoke,drinks an occasional beer, and has never had any extra-marital affairs..

-------------------------------------

Who would you vote for with the knowledge presented here which is TRUE?

Candidate A?

Candidate B?

Candidate C?

(No spoilers if you've heard this)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*$iLk shakes his head

Okay, the point of this whole exercise is to get people to vote for Candidate C. However the moral is that people aren't always what they appear to be. The candidates are:

Candidate A is Franklin Roosevelt

Candidate B is Winston CHurchill

Candidate C is Adolf Hitler

Kinda makes ya think, doesn't it ??????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:

Candidate A is Franklin Roosevelt

Candidate B is Winston CHurchill

Candidate C is Adolf Hitler

Kinda makes ya think, doesn't it ?????

No it dosen't. If you look hard enough there's a good side and a bad side to everyone.

You just happend to post the bad side of Candidates A and B, and post the good side of Candidate C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:

From what I gather then of the 3 choices that the 'normal' choices A & B is that these types of charachters make better leaders.

Candidate C was a brillent leader, he just had all the wrong motives.

[ 11-05-2001: Message edited by: SpotSD ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:

Originally posted by SpotSD:

Candidate C was a brillent leader, he just had all the wrong motives.

[ 11-05-2001: Message edited by: SpotSD ]

Erm , hardly. His motivation was to make Germany great. Nothing wrong with that. His methods of leadership were at fault: hate, xenophobia, anti-semiticism, racism, fervent nationalism? Hardly the methods of a great leader.

I wouldn't have voted for C anyway. Never trust a vegetarian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:

Originally posted by Paddy Gregory:

Erm , hardly. His motivation was to make Germany great. Nothing wrong with that. His methods of leadership were at fault: hate, xenophobia, anti-semiticism, racism, fervent nationalism? Hardly the methods of a great leader.

I wouldn't have voted for C anyway. Never trust a vegetarian.


Hey whats wrong with Vegetarians

LOL

just joking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I agree with SpotSD and Epsilon 5. What Adolf Hitler did was brilliantly evil. He took a minority (Knowing that a majority usually has more power) and made them scapegoats. He gave the people a common enemy to unite them. If you take a classroom of third graders, and tell them that the children with blue eyes are better than the children with brown eyes (assuming there are more blue-eyed children), you will see the blue eyed children opress the brown eyed children. Hitler got the majority to stand with him.

Nevertheless, what he did was WRONG. Even that experiment with school children would not be performed these days. Had Hitler been soft in acomplishing his goals, he would have had such minds as Einstein on his side (Who was Jewish). He was caught up in his ambition and carried it too far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was brilliantly evil. Not a good combination. He did many good things which were overshadowed by the evil deeds he did. While it is justified that he is demonized, it is done to the point where the waters of history are muddied and people believe the goal of National Socialism was the genocide of jews. Before Hitler - it wasn't.

Ah well, nice to see you guys vote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:

What Adolf Hitler did was brilliantly evil. He took a minority (Knowing that a majority usually has more power) and made them scapegoats. He gave the people a common enemy to unite them.

This sounds a lot like Clinton's triangulation strategy. Clinton would pit one group against another and then claim the middle ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest dnoyeB!

Not surprising. Candidate C was the most commited to his purpose in my opinion. His habits reflect his self respect and discipline. But none of the information reflected his bent ideology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...