Supreme Cmdr Posted January 8, 2006 Report Posted January 8, 2006 http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/01/07/the_poin...ame_journalism/ http://newswire.gamehelper.com/common/defa...ARTICLES&ID=459 I took one look at the review of X3 in PCG this month and shook my head. That was after the reviewer had clearly indicated that they don't review patched games, how horribly broken the game was. It scored 79%. Our relatively bug free game, scored what? Why? Because the reviewer didn't think that it was a big step from the previous game. X3, which started out as an add-on and doesn't even have half the improvements over X2 that UCAWA had over UC. There was tons of X3 ads in PCG (and other mags) going back many moons. Oh well. ps: This month's CGM gave it 1.5/5 star
TARWMSRK Posted January 8, 2006 Report Posted January 8, 2006 OUCH Gonna have to work hard and blow everyone away with your next title. Relive your glory days!
Supreme Cmdr Posted January 8, 2006 Author Report Posted January 8, 2006 uhm, it was X3 that CGM gave 1.5 stars. The UCAWA review will be in the next issue.
Darien Wolfe Posted January 8, 2006 Report Posted January 8, 2006 Ow. That's harsh 1.5/5... I've been tinkering with X3 and the 1.3 patch, still buggy, but they're fixing it bless their little cotton socks. I'm quite pleased with some of the mods the X3 scripters have come out with though, they certainly need to be given medals for their efforts.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now