Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Reuters

Just found this little snippet in the news section.

quote:

Microsoft Corp. on Thursday took aim at the Linux operating system and other rival software that share their basic instruction codes with the public, saying such freely distributed "open source" software poses a threat to commercial intellectual property rights...

...He described the open software movement as "flimsy," "flawed," jeopardizing property rights and threatening to undermine the software industry, a key economic growth engine.

Any thoughts? I think it's ridiculous and hope it doesn't go through. I hope Microsoft gets laughed out of whatever avenue they try to follow.

Posted

Got that right Charles, I hope they get laughed right out. What are they so afraid of, they may miss out on a few people who choose linux and not be assimilated?

This is very funny though, but it sounds so typical of microsoft, I better watch my mouth, they are one of my larger customers!! lol

Posted

Lets break that idiotic comment down:

"He described the open software movement as "flimsy," "flawed," jeopardizing property rights and threatening to undermine the software industry, a key economic growth engine"

Part 1: "He described the open software movement as "flimsy," "flawed,"

Sounds like Windows to me. Linux beats the crap outta windows in quality. Heck, Linux is almost hacker-safe. Which brings us to the real reason...part 2:

"jeopardizing property rights and threatening to undermine the software industry, a key economic growth engine"

Translation: Jeopardizing MICROSOFT's standing as the #1 OS coders out there, undermining MICROSOFT software industry, MICROSOFT's key economic growth engine.

Bill Gates, get your head out your ass and try to at least CATCH UP with linux. You're waaay behind.

Marketing vs quality.. too bad games dont run in linux (and linux not made for running games either *sniff*)

Posted

I had a short lived affair with Linux about this time last year it certainly is way above MS on stability and such but as 90% of my home pc time is Gaming I dumped Linux for Win2k and haven't looked back. MS have some flaws but they also make some damn good software aswell!

Posted

They really do make some good stuff, I think it's just that the company got so big that comunications between some of it's parts are breaking down and they are trying to blame everyone else(ex. Linux) for whatever problems they might have, too bad SC isn't running Microsoft, he would whip that company right into shape. I wonder if Microsoft will ever brake down and dissapear or will it stay forever? I actually hope it stays, like I said, some of the stuff they make are pretty good.

[ 05-04-2001: Message edited by: Soback ]

Posted

It's not a new line from them, they claimed open source stiffles innovation before a congressional committee earlier this year and no one believed them then either.

Posted

quote:

Anyone know why win2k works so well? Because it's NOT a MS product, it just bear their name.

Huh? I thought that Win2k was just Windows NT5 with a different name.

Posted

Epsilon, Don't know where you got that info, but it is not true, Win2K is a cross or a hibred if you will between Win98SE and Windows NT.

Posted

What a bunch of CRAP! There are *SO* many programs out there that are open source. There are even some languages that HAVE to be distributed in source form (including Perl, the thing this board is programed with). Plus, look at some of the better open source software out there - the Apache Web server comes to mind. It is licensed for FREE. Hell, look up a few CGI depositories.

Microsoft is just pissed because open source allows other companies to save a good amount of money in that they do not have to do new compiles for each platform they support. It also allows further user customization (subject to license agreements) - and the user does NOT have to PAY a company like Microsoft to do those customizations.

The real problem here isn't Microsoft, though - its that the liberals in this country ENCOURAGE frivolous lawsuits.

Posted

Heh, this doesn't suprise me, it's either Gates' way, or no way.

I am considering purchasing Mandrake 8.0 and installing it on my new pc later this year. Why, so I can learn Linux, I feel it is just a matter of time.

Posted

Don't they have enough money?

Nah, 3 zillion dollars in sale each quarter isn't enough.

I'll have linux on my computer when I'll have a bigger hard drive (mine is 6gig, 4 used by games) and when a good emulator will be out (good=everything work with no more than 10-20% slowdown).

And when it will be much more user friendly. I was lost when I installed linux once.

SC, anything about releasing a linux BCM ver?

Posted

SC has answered this question before, and if he has not changed his mind, there will be NO support for Linux. Sorry guys, so you better hope that there is an emulator that gets built that will work for you, otherwise, sorry, YOU WILL BE ASSIMILATED!!!

Posted

A little more fuel for the fires:

Torvalds speaks out about MSs Open Source position.

SIIA issued a press release on behalf of its members.

There's also a nice piece by Andrew Leonard at Salon.com.

My favorite quote is

quote:

Linus Torvalds said:

I wonder if Mundie has ever heard of Sir Isaac Newton? He's not only famous for having basically set the foundations for classical mechanics (and the the original theory of gravitation, which is what most people remember, along with the apple tree story), but he is also famous for how he acknowledged the achievement:

"If I have been able to see further, it was only because I stood on the shoulders of giants".

One of the greatest scientists of our time, having done more for modern technology (and thus, btw, for the modern economy) that Microsoft will ever do, acknowledged the fact that he did so by being able to use the knowledge (what we now call "intellectual property") gathered by others.


Posted

BOO!!!!

What a load of bullshit!!! In that report MS take a pop about Open Source, and then they propose "Shared Source", which is (Apparently) the same as Open Source, except any changes have to be approved by MS, and they're the only ones allowed to make money from it.

Whatever next?? MS Trying to copyright Open Source or the GNU??

Slightly off topic: Have any of you seen the prank reviews that were on Amazon.co.uk (they've been deleted now ), for Linux & Windows 2000? Enjoy!

Reviewer: William Gates from Redmont USA

It's amazing, a load of smelly hackers sitting around in their basements have wrote a stunning piece of software, and it wasn't us. You wouldn't catch me actually running Windows, hell no-one at work does, you should have seen the fight for the OSX CD when it got delivered! Linux is a good investment for anyone who wants an OS with 'teeth'.

Reviewer: Linus Torvalds from Finland

Despite fifteen years using Linux (most of those with Red Hat) I would recommend people to actually go out and use Windows. You see the actual Linux OS is not too good, the kernel (core functions) is really bad and the GUI elements feel like they've been stuck on with glue. Red Hat is really the worst of the distros and after ten minutes of using it, you'll be reaching for the Windows CD!

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...