Supreme Cmdr Report post Posted July 13, 2003 ....gits without a clue OK, here is how the word Rubbish is explained rubbish n. Refuse; garbage.Worthless material.Foolish discourse; nonsense. Now add the words, complete and utter to this term, and you'll come up with complete and utter rubbish. Which describes this movie. 2/10 (just because Sean Connery and Peta Wilson are in it. They each get 1 star for effort and for even being in the movie). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LostInSpace Report post Posted July 13, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Supreme Cmdr: ....gits without a clue OK, here is how the word Rubbish is explained rubbish n. Refuse; garbage.Worthless material.Foolish discourse; nonsense. Now add the words, complete and utter to this term, and you'll come up with complete and utter rubbish. Which describes this movie. 2/10 (just because Sean Connery and Peta Wilson are in it. They each get 1 star for effort and for even being in the movie). Damn, I was hoping it was at least passible. Oh well. When I first saw the commercial for it I said to myself "EH". The one thing that had me scratching my head was why League of extrodinary gentlemen when there's also a women involved in the troop. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Grayfox Report post Posted July 13, 2003 because it has to be politically correct. i was thinking about seeing this one tomorrow... i might chance it, and go see another movie to boot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted July 13, 2003 Derek. Hands off that Laptop and go stare at the sun for a while. Its just freaky to see a dictionary LINK from you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supreme Cmdr Report post Posted July 13, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Tac: Derek. Hands off that Laptop and go stare at the sun for a while. Its just freaky to see a dictionary LINK from you. hehe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
d8alus Report post Posted July 13, 2003 Umm...Could you elaborate a bit on the why's of it? I was gonna go see this with friends, so I'd like to know why you think it sucked.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Commander Elio Jason Report post Posted July 13, 2003 the first movie of the summer that officially sucks. thanks for the warning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supreme Cmdr Report post Posted July 13, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Kiran: Umm...Could you elaborate a bit on the why's of it? I was gonna go see this with friends, so I'd like to know why you think it sucked.... I don't have time. But I'm sure that you should be able to find tons of reviews online. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eclipse Report post Posted July 13, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Supreme Cmdr: 2/10 (just because Sean Connery and Peta Wilson are in it. They each get 1 star for effort and for even being in the movie). I guess this balances out the high scores you've been giving out of late. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spindoktor Report post Posted July 13, 2003 Here's a couple of reviews. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Põdi Report post Posted July 14, 2003 Oh dear But please don't confuse this with the suberbly ingenious League of Gentlemen. Is anyone screening it over in the US yet? If you like dark, surreal comedy, this is right up your street. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin Trotter Report post Posted July 14, 2003 SC maybe you should take a NEW hobby like cultivating an ant farm, eh? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supreme Cmdr Report post Posted July 14, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Race Bannon IV: SC maybe you should take a NEW hobby like cultivating an ant farm, eh? hehe, I'm not the one who hates every movie Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted July 14, 2003 "SC maybe you should take a NEW hobby like cultivating an ant farm, eh?" Dear lord no! You KNOW he will end up making a PERSCAN in his laptop to keep track of them. ID:Worker Ant# 23245 Loc: Kitchen (2443N,4353W) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supreme Cmdr Report post Posted July 14, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Tac: "SC maybe you should take a NEW hobby like cultivating an ant farm, eh?" Dear lord no! You KNOW he will end up making a PERSCAN in his laptop to keep track of them. ID:Worker Ant# 23245 Loc: Kitchen (2443N,4353W) ROTFLMAO!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tyrn Report post Posted July 14, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Tac: "SC maybe you should take a NEW hobby like cultivating an ant farm, eh?" Dear lord no! You KNOW he will end up making a PERSCAN in his laptop to keep track of them. ID:Worker Ant# 23245 Loc: Kitchen (2443N,4353W) Oh good heavens, I need a good belly laugh like that at least once a day! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supreme Cmdr Report post Posted July 14, 2003 quote:Originally posted by Tyrn: Oh good heavens, I need a good belly laugh like that at least once a day! Well, it should come as no surprise. I mean, this is Tac we're talking about here. Where he gets this stuff from, is anyone's guess. But damn that was hilarious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bandus Report post Posted July 15, 2003 ROFL Tac. That was too much. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Epsilon 5 Report post Posted July 15, 2003 now he'll find a dumb enough ant to be resnig and put it in charge of repelling "intruders" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Urza Report post Posted July 18, 2003 Err, back to the movie. I saw it (for free, as usual), and I didn't think it was as bad as everyone made it out to be. If you can overlook the plot holes and places where it simply defies logic, it's an enjoyable summer actioner. 5/10 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kschang Report post Posted July 20, 2003 I give it a 6, which is actually a bit lower than I usually give, but better than all the reviews I read online. I don't mind the SFX... They are pretty well done. The twist is not that bad. The MAIN problem is this is an ensemble show, thus you had to spread things out, everybody get SOME screentime. I had the same problem with X-Men 2. You can just see the ending from a mile away. The young guy will take over, and that target practice scene on the bridge all but gave away the ending. The overall style is fine, but the anachronistic weapons and tech are often a BIT too much. Machine guns, sure. Automobile, sure. But... Sub-launched ICBM? Cloning? It's a bit jarring. It's not THAT bad... I'd say Waterworld and such are worse, but it's NOT good either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LordDavid Report post Posted July 21, 2003 Saw it. I give it somewhere around a 5 out of 10. It is pretty good as a very mindless B-type movie. Can't take it with even one ounce of seriousness though. I thought it was just too funny that Captain Nemo is this quick and nimble Kung-Fu martial arts fighter! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bandus Report post Posted July 21, 2003 This movie definetly gets filed in the WTF?!? category. It was like the worst of all the Disney movies combined. Did anyone notice that a Nautilus was bigger than a modern day AIRCRAFT CARRIER?!? I mean, holy hell. Not only was it that massive, does anyone have any idea what kind of force would be needed to move an object like that let alone move it at that rate of speed! Where else can we go with this? Oh yes, Shane West wasn't killed when his car went catapulting at 70 MPH into a cement building and then said cement building gets hit with a TOMAHAWK missile that shouldn't have even existed?!? I give this movie a 2/10. I'm actually lieing to myself so I feel I at least got my money's worth out of the movie (which I didn't). I'm with the SC on this one....pure rubbish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
