Supreme Cmdr

OK, a new refresh has been uploaded. You folks can try it.

Its Superman and all, but thus far, it doesn't move me. I sure hope the movie lives up to the overwhelming expectations. Anyway, new trailer is up today.

I knew he was going to be a kick-a$$ bond!!! He's not as stiff as the other bonds.

You can see the press release over here [ 05-10-2006, 04:14 PM: Message edited by: Supreme Cmdr ]

Check the shots page

quote: Originally posted by Prez: Nothing is going to come to light. This is going to die a slow quiet death and people years from now will distance themselves from ever having bought into yet another silly conspiracy. Famous last words. We'll just have to wait and see.

The whole thing smells of coverup and I'm sure that when it all comes to light, we're going to be hearing some crap about it being for the good of the people.

If that log file is empty, then the video sub-system (DX) didn't even initialize. Are you sure only one .log file exists? Well, I'm stumped. Back to the drawing board.

Did Flight 93 Crash in Shanksville? ....yes Joe, it gets weirder

Add /w1 /d5 to the shortcut and try it again. Post the contents of the debug log files. Also, make absolutely certain that you have installed the April DX runtime. When in doubt, re-install and reboot.

uhm, try disabling the logo with /n. And run it in a Window to see if you can catch an error message.

The more I read and do research (I'm on a mini-vacation due to my recent move), the more I'm convinced of the following: Planes were hijacked. That much is pretty obvious. One plane did crash into the Pentagon. United 93 never crashed into a field. It was shot down in mid-air. Two planes did in fact crash into the WTC towers. My thoughts on the guided missile theory are still up in the air. WTC build #7, like the other two towers, was brought down by a controlled demolition. A foreign group of agents (The Mosad?) had a part to play in 9/11 Someone is missing a helluva lotta gold bullions from WTC #7. Considering that the trucks with the gold were abandoned a short distance from the building, leads me to believe that like some, they had advance warning of the attacks. There is no way that they could have been moving all that gold after the first place hit.

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0429-21.htm

Wny make this movie?

Seriously, the antics of our govt. is getting even more chilling each day.

You probably have scripts for that page turned off

Redux - What really happened to United 93

OK, I've uploaded a newly protected build. Change your version in the INI file to .13 and run the Updater.

Yes, we're suggesting that the govt. - while incompetent for the most part - is corrupt. uhm, what was the argument again?

quote: Originally posted by Prez: quote: For the love of God, before you start crying about fakes, at the very least, DO the research. Well, I read the information in it's entirety on the websites you linked to. I was impressed with the extent these people are going to to pull this one off. What other research am I "obligated" to do when I know this is all a bunch of melarchy? Why should I expend the effort on something so silly? You claimed that the pictures were doctored. They clearly weren't. So that right there is blatantly FALSE because I - like most sensible and rational people - LOOKED at the original footage that was linked to. And the footage was not just CNN. There is footage from ABC, FOX, other foreign media etc. So don't even go down that foolish route about CNN being biased. Thats just rubbish and you KNOW it. I am also aware of that debunking link and I still don't believe it. There are always two sides to a story; and somewhere in the middle, lies the truth. Lack of evidence is not evidence of truth. Thats why we have something called - wait for it - reasonable doubt Even the site you link to above, poses more questions than it answers. Here's one such sample. quote: WHERE the Pentagon was hit is strong evidence for official complicity. , since a flight school drop out would not have chosen (nor been able) to fly a plane into the mostly empty sector of the Pentagon. Hani Hanjour, a flight school drop out, clearly could not have performed this extremely difficult flying maneuver. While it is possible that a Saudi or Egyptian air force expert pilot could have been substituted for Mr. Hanjour, a terrorist would not have chosen to hit the Pentagon in the one way that minimized damage and casualties. This fact suggests that 9/11 was an "inside job," arranged by a faction in the US military. Those who are inclined to invent a statistic to explain this surreal "coincidence" should realize that the odds were not one in five -- but virtually impossible (and beyond statistical explanations). I also found this interesting.. quote: The "pod" plane claims have not had substantial impact, since they are strange, based on fuzzy pictures and have been clearly refuted by the 9/11 truth movement - the pod is merely a carefully chosen photo of the normal "fairing" bulge between the wing and the fuselage. (It would not be surprising to see "no building" theories as part of this information warfare attack.) [ 05-01-2006, 11:08 AM: Message edited by: Supreme Cmdr ]

http://www.worthplaying.com/article.php?sid=33792

quote: Originally posted by DeepFreeze: The problem with this entire discussion is that no one can freely debate topic because even the suggestion that its a conspiracy means you're insulting national heroes and are instantly and forever an unpatriotic blaspheming heretic. Exactly. However, as far as United 93 is concerned, if in fact it never existed, what happened to the passengers who died on that flight? Did it actually exist and was shot down? For one thing, there is CLEAR evidence that only about five people from that particular flight, are on the victims compensation list. So, if, for e.g. Beamer did in fact die on that flight, uhm, how is that remotely possible? Obviously some people died. I mean, they can't exactly whisk them off away into a sort of witness protection program. That would represent a serious security risk for the conspiracy. Like I said, there is definitely something amiss and eventually, all will be revealed. [ 05-01-2006, 09:20 AM: Message edited by: Supreme Cmdr ]

Wal-marts Wikipedia War

quote: Originally posted by Prez: The still photos are indeed a clever touch, but almost certainly fake. Well-made and industrious fakes to be sure, but still fakes. It is simply too easy to doctor photos and post them on the net. Rubbish. First of all, the people over at the two 9/11 sites posted in this thread, are highly credible public figures. Not some net kooks. Also, I LOOKED at the CNN and other network footage from which those videos and stills were obtained. They are IDENTICAL and 100% UNDOCTORED. I am a graphics person and can easily spot a fake. The link I posted above about the pods under the aircraft, are CLEARLY there in the CNN footage. For the love of God, before you start crying about fakes, at the very least, DO the research. As a scientist, I don't jump on anyone's bandwagon, but rather rely on hard evidence and facts. There are far too many questions about the 9/11 incidents than there are answers. Even if you discount the WTC evidence, it is 100% clear that NO aircraft - at least not a 7 series Boeing - hit the Pentagon nor crash in a Penn state field. This is a govt. coverup of epic proportions; and one day, we'll be posting in this very thread once the investigations and indictments start flying. If its one thing I've learned about our country; it is that a secret of this magnitude eventually falls apart. To pull something off like this would take a ton of military (high and low) level personnel and quite possibly foreign (e.g. Mosad) govt. assistance. I can't even begin to imagine the ramifications of this, if it were in fact true that foreign govt. were involved in this and operating on US soil.

OK, am on it.