Jump to content

Supreme Cmdr

Administrators
  • Posts

    16,954
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Supreme Cmdr

  1. quote: Originally posted by echo: Ok..Ok... I said it might be me and my inability to find things! ..uhm, yeah quote: Originally posted by aramike: I'm secure enough in being secure in my masculinity to say that I outright refused my wife's request that I watch this movie with her. She told me that it would be alright; that it was just a love story... blah... blah... To which I explained that just because a man is uncomfortable with watching a love story about homosexualty, it doesn't mean he's homophobic, or a bigot, or whatever... How many men do YOU know that watches a LOVE story, PERIOD? The last "love" story I was witness to was Sleepless in Seattle. Let's just say, "Sleepless" no more. I absolutely agree. Which is why I didn't - and don't intend to - watch it. Love stories are one thing. Homosexual love stories are clearly another. For the record, I'm not homophobic in any way, shape or form and could care less about someone's sexual orientation; especially since it is purely based on one's genetic makeup and which you can't hold against them.
  2. LOL!! Yeah, she meant Brokeback Mountain.
  3. Yeah, I thought it was really great casting. The animation of Hammy just totally suited Steve. One of my favorite parts was at the end where he was seemingly moving so fast, that everything seemed to be standing still. Genius.
  4. uhm, wow. Not only did you actually CREATE a topic, you actually made a post that is more than four lines long!!!! Echo, are you getting braver in your old age or is it just me? /me runs while ducking ps: what was the name of the movie btw? I love mysterious posts!!
  5. 'Da Vinci Code' Film Softens Novel ...oh, and Roger's hilarious review [ 05-24-2006, 11:21 AM: Message edited by: Supreme Cmdr ]
  6. But that SMD display is not used solely for that. Its the same display used for viewing what cargo (if any) another ship is carrying. For e.g. in some missions, I specifically script cargo items (e.g. weapons) in some ships. Without using this display, there is no way of finding out if in fact such an item is onboard.
  7. Weird. Looks like this was disabled back in 08/05 in the version before the final Gold. I have no clue why; but I have now re-enabled it. I'm surprised that nobody has noticed this since then because this hasn't worked in ANY version of UCAWA since its release. I'll see about rolling out a patch over the weekend.
  8. quote: Originally posted by aramike: The movie's plot was slow and plodding, Tom Hanks' character had absolutely no depth, and the dialogue was as dry and technical as a History Channel special on the combustion engine. It got so bad that during the latter half of the movie there seemed to be about 30+ minutes of so little happening that one could literally hear every throat clear and every squirm in the packed theater. I couldn't agree more.
  9. OK, thats definitely fishy. Send the UCAWA saved game to [email protected] and let me take a look see.
  10. You need to reproduce the IDENTICAL instances in UCAWA. The shots you show of UC, are of a shuttle on the planet. The shots from UCAWA, are of a shuttle in space. So, those results are inconclusive and I'm not going to investigate until I know for certain what is going, what you are doing and how you are doing it.
  11. Come to think of it, I don't ever remember removing it from UCAWA. I'd have to check my dev notes on that and see why it was done. The last thing I remember changing in UCAWA related to SMD, was the ability to view the cargo contents of scripted objects *as well as* friendlies in VDD/SMD mode. Also, are you sure that you are viewing your own asset's stores? Are you using the TACSCAN/SUL filter or not? Anyway, post some pics so that I can see what is going on in UCAWA. Anyway, in the future, please be *specific*. Your first report made it some like you were talking about the mouse-over in the shuttle section of the HUD (right side). That display never had the ability to do this. Thats why there is a specific SMD mode in the VDD.
  12. quote: Originally posted by $iLk: I'm a Christian who dislikes organized religion - especially the Catholic Church who I feel is all pomp. They venerate men of their own choosing as 'saints' and dress in golden robes of silk and ornate jewelry - then look down on everyone below them as if they are the ones in authority. What is the difference between the cardinals and the pharisees? uhm, wrong thread?
  13. No clue what you are talking about and NONE of those steps above, make any sense. You might want to EXACTLY describe what you're doing and the steps taken. e.g. when I hover the cursor over the shuttle's slot on HUD makes no sense. Also, it never was possible to view a drone's stores. [ 05-23-2006, 09:00 AM: Message edited by: Supreme Cmdr ]
  14. This just makes me wanna hurl. Seriously. $224m?!?! There's no such thing as bad publicity is proven once again.
  15. Well, its not like they're saying that everyone should switch to Ethanol. So, cars that can't use it, shouldn't be pumped with it. Me? I can't wait until the day when I can just whip it out, piss in my tank and drive off. God knows I drink enough coffee to make sure I fill the tank at my first morning run.
  16. uhm...ok, I'm, uh, stumped at this exchange. So I'll just cut my losses and go back to work.
  17. Ethanol: Myths and Realities
  18. ...and somehow, somewhere in your brain, you got the message that UC and UCAWA had the same requirements and used the same resources? Right? You've gotta be sh*tting me.
  19. This pretty much sums up my thoughts
  20. Di you actually READ the notes on preloading? What gave you the idea that 512MB RAM was enough?
  21. Thats our society isn't it? Remember, the book sold in excess of $40m copies in over 40 languages. So even with $77m in revenue, thats not such a big number. But seriously, the movie is rubbish. I can't wait to hear Scriv's take on it.
  22. No, seriously, its rubbish.
  23. This movie gives new meaning to book-to-movie adaptation disappointment. Seriously, the critics aren't kidding Tom Hanks was as stiff, out of place and terribly miscast as ever. He literally waded through the movie like he was too bored to be there. If you have read the book - a huge page turner - you would be sorely disappointed by the movie. This of course depends on your tolerance threshold. Not only did they take liberties with the book (WHY does Hollywood do this??!?), they also royally screwed up the urgency and excitement of the book. To me, the movie felt like a cross between a PBS special and a made-for-tv (not even DVD) movie. If you can, wait for the DVD. If you haven't yet read the book, then watch the movie BEFORE you buy and read the book. 2/10
  24. Its not their best, but its fun for the whole family. The kids will love it. 8/10
  25. Whoa!!! How did I miss this thread?!?!? Congrats ol' chap!!!
×
×
  • Create New...