BladeMasterX

Yes i am sorry too, now i know that its wrong to post a response in a matter of two minutes and repspond to the message that is the response to that quickly and so on, sorry i wont do it again. And i believe the association with liberal and not wanting war is that most liberals DONT want war

and we are awaiting an answer from stupidity, obviously he realized his mistake and is purposely not answering, but of course i could be wrong and his name could prove to be truth.

wow, why are you saying this? are you trying to provoke an argument against liberals like you?

clearly because on the ruminations of war when we were talking about iraq he goes on a tangent about the inefficientcy of the U.N. in Rwanda, which arguably is the same case in Iraq, but really the situation is completely different.

first of all i know what u mean stupidity but sadly what is "Hegominstic" its not a word you probably mean hegemonist? I never knew saddam was domed. Who built a dome over him? And clearly BULLY is spelt BULLY not the plural form bullies, bullie spelled like that is not a word plural or present tense or even past tense. [ 05-13-2004, 07:20 PM: Message edited by: BladeMasterX ]

which is what im saying WOULD have happen had we just let communism slide without a fight

No it is not wrong, it is completely right if you are doing something concerning national security or your actions are harming somone intentionally or are going to to harm someone intentionally, if its already happend or you have the intent of it

you also cant go and assume whatever i say and whatever sources i have are wrong, you also cant say that im ill-informed, plz mind me for the doulbe post, tried to include it all on the other one but it made this a second one

No i dont say nuke everything sadly.

god what im trying to say that if i did something truly wrongful in my protestions, of course i would question it and say it was wrong provided if i didnt do something truly wrong

God, nader is even more liberal than Kerry

i agree a much more expanded version of what im trying to say

No i listin to things on the other side, providing that there reasonable, and if i were to do something like your example i would attcept that punishment

yes i did that is just explaining what i meant in a previous post of mine to those that did not understand what i was trying to say

i read around on the internet just a little excuse me