BladeMasterX

Yes i am sorry too, now i know that its wrong to post a response in a matter of two minutes and repspond to the message that is the response to that quickly and so on, sorry i wont do it again. And i believe the association with liberal and not wanting war is that most liberals DONT want war

and we are awaiting an answer from stupidity, obviously he realized his mistake and is purposely not answering, but of course i could be wrong and his name could prove to be truth.

wow, why are you saying this? are you trying to provoke an argument against liberals like you?

clearly because on the ruminations of war when we were talking about iraq he goes on a tangent about the inefficientcy of the U.N. in Rwanda, which arguably is the same case in Iraq, but really the situation is completely different.

first of all i know what u mean stupidity but sadly what is "Hegominstic" its not a word you probably mean hegemonist? I never knew saddam was domed. Who built a dome over him? And clearly BULLY is spelt BULLY not the plural form bullies, bullie spelled like that is not a word plural or present tense or even past tense. [ 05-13-2004, 07:20 PM: Message edited by: BladeMasterX ]

which is what im saying WOULD have happen had we just let communism slide without a fight

No it is not wrong, it is completely right if you are doing something concerning national security or your actions are harming somone intentionally or are going to to harm someone intentionally, if its already happend or you have the intent of it

you also cant go and assume whatever i say and whatever sources i have are wrong, you also cant say that im ill-informed, plz mind me for the doulbe post, tried to include it all on the other one but it made this a second one

No i dont say nuke everything sadly.

god what im trying to say that if i did something truly wrongful in my protestions, of course i would question it and say it was wrong provided if i didnt do something truly wrong

God, nader is even more liberal than Kerry

i agree a much more expanded version of what im trying to say

No i listin to things on the other side, providing that there reasonable, and if i were to do something like your example i would attcept that punishment

yes i did that is just explaining what i meant in a previous post of mine to those that did not understand what i was trying to say

i read around on the internet just a little excuse me

NO that is not what im saying, what im saying is if we just let communism slide without a fight and with no effort to stop it

Proof of your statements mean nothing. There is no such thing as a definite answer for the vietnam war, stop trying to jusitify your opinion that your opinion is the right solution

Neccessary. The situation was being investigated.

No. There is NO good communist nation. You bleeding heart liberal.

War was a neccessary in Iraq AND Afganhistan, did you not read my post, Iraq was given MANY warnings, and MANY chances. The Afganhistan government and other terrorist organizations that were in Afganhistan were at the root of the 9/11 incident. I think attacking their country and dissolving those organizations is not even a good enough punishment ofr the slaughter of over 2,000 people.

honestly heres my two cents, if a straight couple is going ot have children, the maximum they should have is two, because the world is already beginning to get overpopulated, look at china. if you only have two, the world will stay at relatively the same population, because in the future the children would be taking the place of the mom and dad in the population. This is my two cents though.

i wont be able vote in this election (not 18 yet) but if i could i would vote for bush, kerry is just a big moron and Bush hasnt done a bad job at all

I'm willing to bet that Bush will win the election big.

The Patriot act is a very good thing. Even if there was the slightest chance of them stoping and preventing a terrorist act or a crime, it would be worth it. So what if the government sees some of the things you are doing. If you have a problem with the government monitoring some of your activities, obviously you should not be doing them. You say move to Britan Cadrian where their government has much more control over their media than we do? I say thats a good thing but in some ways its bad. The judicial system in america is also slightly bad. Half the time the guilty are stated innocent by the jury and the innocent are stated guilty. Half the time this is because the people want somethign to put the blame on and suffer for a task. I say a person should not be claimed guilty unless there is decent proof against them or they are without a doubt guilty. Twisting of words by lawyers are not my idea of proving somone guilty or innocent. I've been noticing a trend here too. Most of the time Jaguar seems to be the only one thats saying anything that has some sense in it.

i agree that more people die from stupid idiotic preventable car accidents and drunk driving accidnets, and murder than all the rest im not protesting against that i actually agree with your point with that, im saying people should stop frigging bashing bush and worry about things that they could prevent. When people drive drunk they are only thinking about themselves. They think oh well its my life i can do what i want. No. When you drive drunk you put yourself and others in danger. You should think about the sadness and grief that others would be put through if you or somoene you got in an accident with died. Hell what if you were a driver in a car with six other people in it, you were driving drunk, got into an accident, and all of the people in the vehicle died except you. How would you feel if that happend? One of the things in this world that im strongly against are drugs and alcohol. I strongly support enforcement of the borders and the war against drugs.