Supreme Cmdr

Check the reg page. The online VCF has also been updated. You have to positively read the VCF before applying this patch. You have been warned. For those of you new to UC. You need to install the v2.00.00 patch first, before installing this patch on top of it. The MD5 hash file is also on the page. You can use a program such as WinMD5 to compare this hash against the file you downloaded. To check the download's MD5 hash, do the following: download the patch and extract the contents into the game install folder. Run winMD5 (or similar program) Go to File/Open MD5 file and load the patch MD5 file located in the game install folder. Go to File/Open File and load the patch file you downloaded above. If winMD5 reports the status as good, then your patch downloaded correctly and can be used to patch the game. WARNING: Due to users going from the base 2.00.00 patch to the current 2.00.xx patch; this patch WILL delete ALL saved games. So, if you are upgrading from 2.00.15 or higher, backup the files in the SAVE folder before applying the patch. If you run an mp server, you should also backup your UCSETUPMP.INI file. After applying the patch, copy them back to the SAVE folder. If you attempt to do this with any saved game version earlier than the specified version, good luck bud.

I have fixed this in the 2.00.19 patch which I am currently uploading. btw, it was related to the resupply action not being supported (for the same reason cargo pods are empty and not supported) in mp.

Isn't there are Freelancer thread already? This thread will be deleted.

quote: Originally posted by Cc: It looks like when caste:assassin docks with a station and attempts a resupply a server crash happens. The ASSassin caste is not a trading caste; so it will not attempt to resupply a station. Only COLonist, EXPlorer, DIPlomat, TRAder, COMmercial and TOUrist castes can resupply a station. Anyway, send the server log files to [email protected]. I don't need the Dr Watson log. *moved*

So who else is getting one of these?

Now that this has been banned, the states are now going to spend the next three years lobbying to get it passed when its up for renewal. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, these tits in Florida are still trying to tax home networks. Go figure.

quote: Originally posted by Firehawk: As for "The Ring 2"....Not an ever loving chance in hell am I going to see that!! After me and my fiancee saw this, we bought shrek 2 and watched every bit of that DVD to clear our minds. I've never been so happy to see a cartoon in all of my life

quote: Originally posted by scoochy: Pleased with the graphics? I think this is one of the lowest points in the game...next to the sound and menu system. This title is in dire need of a grafix upgrade, especially if it is going to get out of the budget title price range..... Please learn to respect people's opinions around here or you will be banned - without warning. If you don't like the graphics, thats fine, but don't discount other people's opinions. The game went into development back in early 2002 and was released in early 2004; you've only just got it. So what did you expect? If you knew anything about game development - or the BC games - you should know that graphics are the tradeoff with its massive world and exceptional longevity and gameplay. There is a reason why there isn't a single game that is even close but with better graphics.

No you see why I didn't bother responding. Its not only mentioned in the Homelan interview, it is mentioned in the Avault news piece linked to in the FIRST post in this thread. And I don't see it happening until sometime in late (maybe around Q4) 2005 or maybe even early 2006; since there will already be two UC titles in 2005.

ROTFLMAO

Wow, that looks like a lotta work! Good job!!

Went to see this one yesterday without any expectations and I was quite surprised. Its really good. In fact, I liked it better than both Tomb Raider movies. Definite must-see popcorn movie. 9/10

quote: Originally posted by echo: Sayid is Hot!!!

quote: Originally posted by Fuller: Ok, here goes. 1. Will the capability of sending an away party of marines to an enemy ship be implemented? 2. Can I capture and control enemy ships? Please, please say it is so SC. Which part of the PDF file linked to in the products info page in my first post in this thread, was unclear? Did you see ANY mention of the above in it? No, I didn't think so.

You can see it over here, along with 40 new shots.

quote: Originally posted by Shingen: quote:Originally posted by Supreme Cmdr: Nope. I didn't pick a leader for TDH to begin with. Shingen came to me and asked to setup an official fleet; so I said OK. No offence, but that's not the way I remember it. I don't think I ever asked to create a Raider fleet, I just got asked because I was the oldest original Indie still active. Whoever asked you, it wasn't me. I still have the PM; you were the one who came to me, so I said OK. Anyway, it doesn't matter now. After seeing last nights display by you (including the deleted posts - I knew it was a bad idea allowing the ability to delete posts) and Takvah, the fleet has now been disbanded and deleted from the dB. The former TDH members who want to remain in a fleet, can go to any other fleet BUT Prime. I don't want any refugees from a dsyfunctional fleet, in Prime. Shingen & Takvah, your posting rights will remain revoked (an action taken by Remo and confirmed as warranted by other admins) until further notice. You will not be banned; any other person would have been banned outright. So, everyone needs to go into timeout. No further posts are allowed in this forum until I get around to deleting it. Anyone posting ANYTHING about TDH - or this incident - in ANY other forum, will be banned outright. If you want to discuss it, take it to IRC or email. FWIW, I trust Remo, my Beta testers (and admins) implicitly and without question. When they (e.g. Remo) have stepped out of line or gone overboard, I have always stepped up and intervened, setting them straight. So, this business about sending me complaints about my admins (e.g. Remo) will not stand. Those of you who know, should know by now that loyalty is not something I take lightly. If my admins are out of line, if I'm not around to see it, there are many other admins around to keep me informed. This site is not lawless; even though the ecclectic group of people here, are mostly mad. That is all.

There is no tech support for unauthorized localizations of my games. As you already know, Akella illegally hacked into some of the BCM Gold game files in order to do their own localization. Of course, they botched it; which is why none of the patches will work. And since Akella did that, I have since added code to the UC patches which will uninstall the game and delete the files if they have been tampered with in any way, shape or form. Since nobody has asked me about localizing UC for Russia, I suspect that they may try to do the same with UC. If they do, they'll get sued under the DMCA. In fact, I'm not even going to say anything further (to them or Dreamcatcher) about this since I have already made Dreamcatcher aware of the BCM Gold issue who have assured me that this will not happen again.

You can read it over here [ 11-20-2004, 08:46 AM: Message edited by: Supreme Cmdr ]

quote: Originally posted by Remo Williams: quote:Originally posted by Supreme Cmdr: uhm hmmmm, I see Shingen hasn't said anything to you guys yet? This morning I woke up to a PM from him saying that he was resigning from and scrapping the TDH fleet. heh. You have a new leader in mind for the TDH yet SC? Nope. I didn't pick a leader for TDH to begin with. Shingen came to me and asked to setup an official fleet; so I said OK. Now that he's gone, either someone else takes the reins or I kill the TDH forum and dB entry. I will give the raiders until next Friday to decide what they want to do, before I nuke it. And once that happens, no further official raider fleets will be created.

I know nothing about publishing in Russia. As for UC coming out in Russia, thats Dreamcatcher's deal; I have nothing to do with it. Where did you learn that UC was coming out in Russia in three months?

The AVAULT story has about 40 of those. All the shots were taken on my primary rig. Check my sig. I used the following settings (supported by the new graphics engine through CONFIG): TextureFiltering=ANISO HIGH LightingQuality=HIGH FullScreenAA=1 (2X) Gamma=OFF EnvironmentMap=TRUE SpecularLighting=TRUE SpecularMaps=TRUE GlowMaps=TRUE CompressedTextures=TRUE

quote: Originally posted by Carl Burning: "New multiplayer transport kernel"....can someone tell me what exactly this is? Will this help fix some of the lag problems currently in UC? ....as suspected, here come the utterly silly questions. Have you NOT been paying attention to ALL the recent multiplayer discussions? One of which is a CLEARLY featured topic in the tech support area? And lag (which I can't do anything about) has nothing to do with your multiplayer problems. You're on a 56K modem fer crissakes and thus you have no business being on a Net mp server with more than 2-4 players.

Over here [ 12-18-2004, 11:45 AM: Message edited by: Supreme Cmdr ]

....and then we have this bit about Valve releasing a Warez version of HL2 in order to catch pirates.

ATI Distributing Spurious HL2 Benchmarks heh