Kalshion

Come on you two, for once I must ask that you take this to PM's Why? Causes it's to damn funny to watch you two, nearly sufficated Problem Jaguar If the fact's don't come from CNN, CBS, PBC, ABC, NBC, or MSNBC then they won't believe you. Liberals beleave that the agencys just listed are saints and that they never lie (HAH!) That being said, they'll refuse to check what is said or listened against the congresstional records However, I am pleased to say that one of my liberal friend's switched side's after he found out just how communist CNN really is... and you know how he found that out? By checking something that I've been saying for the past few weeks now. Check. The. Congresstional. Records. They DO NOT lie, everything recorded in there is what happened over the years, they cannot be changed. That being said what is listed is factual As for WMD... It's to much to laugh at, little kid still thinks WMD's do not exist but that's because he refuse's to check the source of who actually said that.. lol.. if he was to ever check it he'd be shocked Edit: ACLU? You're kidding me... ACLU hasn't done jack shit for this country nor have they helped us in any way, they continue to get in the way of people's live's and refuse to leave other's a lone Sorry Street, but you fail to realize the amount of liberal and communist organizations around here.. ACLU is just one org that I wish was disbanded and it's members tossed in prison for tresson American Civil Libertys Union... more like the Anarchy Communist Liberal's Union.. cause they leave people alone and always get into there bussiness.. and when the court DOES do something right (like something that benefits the US) the ACLU steps in and try's to provent it from passing... pathetic..

quote:Originally posted by LostInSpace: Jag, they are not going to believe a word anyone says unless it comes from CNN and/or the other news outlets except for FOX. About time someone come's out and says it. Nice Lost, couldn't have said it better myself

quote:Originally posted by LostInSpace: Jag, they are not going to believe a word anyone says unless it comes from CNN and/or the other news outlets except for FOX. About time someone come's out and says it. Nice Lost, couldn't have said it better myself

Actually, my opinion, I'm both for and against it For it - Because it'll make EVERYONE pay taxes (including the rich) and will put most lawyers out of a job, it'll also make it so that people won't ahve to file income tax reports Againt it - Because everything will go up in price There are always advantage's and disadvantage's to these thigns.. a lot of time's you just have to sacrifice something for the greater good My greater good is that I won't have to file income tax reports, or rather my father won't. I see him up all night sometime's getting stuff together I may work right now, but i don't have to file these thing's until I get a place of my own, and quite frankly I don't have the money for that (house's here cost an arm and a leg, and sometime's a head to,but that's natural since it IS Nevada) So, for honestly, i'm both for and against it. When more information is released then I'll be able to make a better decision, cause right now it's scant information, can't exactly make an absolute decision since most of the fact's are still being hidden

"Relax, the handcuffs are tight because they're new. They'll stretch out after you wear them awhile." "Take your hands off the car, and I'll make your birth certificate a worthless document." "If you run, you'll only go to jail tired." "Can you run faster than 1,200 feet per second? In case you didn't know, that is the average speed of a 9 mm bullet fired from my gun." "So you don't know how fast you were going. I guess that means I can write anything I want on the ticket, huh?" "Yes, Sir, you can talk to the shift supervisor, but I don't think it will help. Oh ... did I mention that I am the shift supervisor?" "Warning! You want a warning? O.K., I'm warning you not to do that again or I'll give you another ticket." "The answer to this last question will determine whether you are drunk or not. Was Mickey Mouse a cat or a dog?" "Fair? You want me to be fair? Listen, fair is a place where you go to ride on rides, eat cotton candy, and step in monkey poop." "Yeah, we have a quota. Two more tickets and my wife gets a toaster oven." "In God we trust, all others we run through NCIC." "Just how big were those two beers?" "No sir we don't have quotas anymore. We used to have quotas but now we're allowed to write as many tickets as we want." "I'm glad to hear the Chief of Police is a good personal friend of yours. At least you know someone who can post your bail." "You didn't think we give pretty women tickets? You're right, we don't. Sign here."

Actaully Street, I'm fully awake.. unlike a certain liberal I know who can't check the congresstional records for proff*SP* You're asking me why I would say somethign about not allowing media into the battles Answer: The media is to BIASED toward one side, that's why I don't want the media into any battles. It's already been proven that there biased in this war. They only report the bad stuff NOT the good stuff (which there is a lot of), if you're going to report on a war report on both sides.. not one side You cannot agree with my Logic cause all you care about is you're liberal party, you could careless about our SOLDIERS LIVES! Who get killed BECAUSE of the media who REPORTS on stuff there NOT suppose to Let me shin some light on this, right now my sister is serving IN Iraq, She's been there for quite some time, She served there for 6 months, then went back and now she's back there... but by choice She tells me that the Media is causing more problem's than the terrorists, and she's a soldier mind you so I trust what she says because she's there.. I'm not Let me tell you this Who do you care more about? Our soldiers? Or the Media? Our Soldiers - who are dieing because the media is reporting stuff they shouldnt' The Media - Cause they feel the people have the right to know EVERYTHING that goes on in Iraq and could careless about the soldiers

What's wrong Street? SCARED that some of this is actually TRUE? You should be, cause it just so happens that a lot of what is said is truth and can be researched if you go to the congresstional records

Letter went around an e-mail list and finally got to me, read it and look at the websites... interesting information Mr. Kerry, You Asked for This By Vincent Fiore August 11, 2004 Vietnam veteran John O'Neil, spokesman of the organization calling itself "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth," released a devastating ad condemning Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry as being unable to "lead," and further calling him dishonest, a betrayer to his shipmates, and most devastating of all, a "liar" regarding the commission of at least one of the Purple Hearts he received. The outrage that quivered off the lips of the Kerry campaign was, understandably, filled with anger and disbelief. (website) Calling a special press conference in May at the National Press Club in Washington, O'Neil and 25 other veterans who served with Kerry, put his campaign on notice when they released this statement: "We resent very deeply the false war crimes charges he made coming back from Vietnam in 1971 and repeated in the book 'Tour of Duty.' We think those cast an aspersion on all those living and dead, from our unit and other units in Vietnam. We think that he knew he was lying when he made the charges, and we think that they're unsupportable. We intend to bring the truth about that to the American people. "We believe, based on our experience with him, that he is totally unfit to be the Commander-in-Chief." These are real tough words from tough, real, men. With the majority of vets throughout the country supporting Bush over Kerry, 58% to 35%, in this year's presidential showdown, it may look to some as if John O'Neil's group is essentially preaching to the choir with this ad. But more on that in a moment. Or how about this gem of an ad run by Democrats in Missouri in 1998: "When you don't vote, you let another church explode. When you don't vote, you allow another cross to burn. When you don't vote, you let another assault wound a brother or sister . . . Vote smart. Vote Democratic for Congress and the U.S. Senate." (web site) So callousness, or smearing to some, is not new to political speech in ads. It is just "new" for Democrats to have it used against them. This "patently false" ad, as the Kerry campaign describes it in a 36-page rebuttal, has the same ring of truth to it as does Kerry's "band of brothers," heroic claims of him. When you get right down to it, it is between these two groups of honorable men who are totally opposite when viewing John Kerry. The choir they preach to is not each other, but the American electorate. I think, though, that I am more offended by the surprised and indignant outrage of the Kerry campaign, and its liberal supporters in the media. So to those among the Democratic Party as a whole, and the media elite that look at political hardball as a one-way street, I ask you: Did you think that Republicans and groups in favor of Bush were going to consistently wilt under your demagogic twaddle, and not fire back one day? Did you believe that you could continuously produce such raw fiction as "9/11 Fahrenheit," and not look in the rear view mirror? Did you expect to push countless books written by accomplished fabricators as Al Franken, Joe Wilson, and Richard Clarke, and not foresee a response headed your way? Did you think that Democratic "527" surrogate groups like MoveOn.org and America Coming Together (ACT), would always be able to run ads that have about as much "truth" in them as a state penitentiary, and not expect payback? Did you really think Bush supporters would just sit back and watch George Soros try to buy the election? Guess again. John Kerry, you asked for this. You have boisterously, and ceaselessly, sought to have the American electorate judge you on your four-month stint in Vietnam in regard to your running for the highest office in the land. You have nearly omitted your last thirty years of your life in politics--as a prosecutor, a lieutenant governor for Michael Dukakis, and as the Senate's most liberal member. It is a strategy of camouflage, and a deceptive one at that. So before anyone among the Democratic Party condemns these other war heroes who have banded together to tell a different story than the one the other "band of brothers" have been telling for months now, pause a moment in your judgment. John O'Neil and his band of brothers have as much validity, and for certain as much right, to say what they want. The only thing you have to do is listen and draw your own conclusions. The problem here is not one of content, but possibly context. For when one looks at John Kerry's career since Vietnam, and just how he has run his campaign, it has almost been one of self-stealth. There are vast areas of his professional life that Kerry is loath to openly discuss--who he really is and just what he has done in his years in politics. When viewed in this context, you see that the charges that John O'Neil and his Swift Boaters are laying at the voter's feet are really not so outrageous at all. Well, the people will know whom to believe. They always do. Interesting.. looking at the swiftboat website actually gave me some more information about Kerry..

quote: This has been openly practiced, since OLD MAN BUSH, instigated it's practice during operation desert storm, and the American people, are so MIS-informed, they have YET to even complain. If what you're preaching is the fact that Desert Storm wasn't covered by the media then I have to say GOOD! The media doesn't have the experience and the know-how to servive during combat operations Example: During this war we have already lost a lot of media personnel YET! During Desert Storm we never lost ONE combat photographer, why? Cause they knew how to do there job without getting into people's way (like the media has been doing) So quite frankly, I'm glad the media wasn't on the battle field and I wish they weren't on the battle field now Most of these media new's corps are not helping america at all, there just ruining it (CNN anyone?) By reporting what our soldiers will be doing next, THEREFOR Giving the enemy the advantage of intelligence You want to win this war... GET RID OF THE MEDIA COVERAGE! Then AND ONLY Then will be be able to win this war Cause right now, as long as the Media stay's there covering it.. we'll continue to lose soldiers No, I'm not blaming Bush here cause he isn't responsible, I'm blaming the Media for being TRAITORS and reporting stuff that they should NOT report One new's agency in particuler that did a lot of that is the Communist New's Network, along with there other communist new's agencys I look at Fox and I see it on there website but they don't report it (because there not suppose to) They'll only report it AFTER the fact Has anyone noticed that the Media no longer reports on what that democratic did? The one that destroyed and stole some documents? (Can't remember name) In reality. He's guilty of espianoge*sp* Funny really, if a Republican had done something like that it would still be on the new's. Yet since a democratic is the one who did it, it's all a hush hush situation... Or another form of Bias, not media though Kerry was in Nevada tuesday (BOO!) and he pronoued Nevada, Neveda, the senator didn't do a thing against him. He also pronounced Yukka,Yokka However, when Bush was here (Yay!) he prnouced Nevada, Navada. This time the senator was all over him, saying he had no right to disrespect the people of Nevada Uhh HELLO!!! Navada IS how it's suppose to be said, that's how our native's here PRONOUCED it, It also happens to be that the E sounds more like an A DUH! Jesus this senetor is STUPID (it's right there in our history books, Either Nevada, or Navada... either one is OK) and besides why isn't she getting on Kerry since he COMPLETELY bouched the spelling.. Neveda.... that's NOT how it's said. Luckily it's on tape (I recorded it because a friend of mine and I went to those demontrations, sicken's me to see how many people like this traitor) Honestly though, it doesn't surprise me that the senator got on Bush. Cause she IS a democrat (Demo-Rat), and could careless how bad her party might sound something out but if someone else who isn't part of her party make's a mistake then she'll try everything in her power to make them look bad [ 08-13-2004, 12:05 PM: Message edited by: Kalshion ]

lol Main reason why I get my new's off the net Kerry was never in Cambodia, it's in the congressional records and say's right there that he wasn't there.. I do find it hard to believe that everyone believe's the media right off the bat without checking the congresstional records first (or last, depending)

Guys don't forget If Derek wanted to, he could buy that license right now.. I think he's just letting the trolls (HLP) have there fun, then he'll bust there bubble

You two obviously havn't been keeping up with the state of Iraq We are rebuilding, although slowly, first where getting a government in place (which is working to a certain extent) After the government is in place then we help out with the rebuilding of the towns We did the same thing after WW2 to Japan and Germany I swear, I don't know where you're getting you're facts from but it's apperently from people who have no freaking clue WHAT is going on in Iraq (typical, the media never report's it and these kid's never research it... go figure) Edit: Bush has more important thing's to worry about, plus he's not in charge of contracts for the over sea's.. Why not read what the president is and isn't capible of doing before you whine like a little child... god... Rebuilding Iraq Iraq in Transition [ 08-11-2004, 01:20 PM: Message edited by: Kalshion ]

Race Bush is not to blame for the job going over sea's stop listening to the baised media The reason job's are going over sea's is because of the government, not BUSH, the government. They raise taxes to a point where the company's aren't able to make enough to pay them, so it's only natural that they go over sea's Stop listening to senseless biased media and do some research, it's RIGHT THERE in the Wall Street Journal, READ IT

Race Bush is not to blame for the job going over sea's stop listening to the baised media The reason job's are going over sea's is because of the government, not BUSH, the government. They raise taxes to a point where the company's aren't able to make enough to pay them, so it's only natural that they go over sea's Stop listening to senseless biased media and do some research, it's RIGHT THERE in the Wall Street Journal, READ IT

quote:Originally posted by LostInSpace: Let's not forget that the presidential wannabe Kerry was also instrumental in dismantaling the intelligence agencies as well. Aye, but you won't find that in any report.. or new's article for that matter I'd comment on the link's above but I won't since Takvah and the die-hard liberals here should already know my stance on such so called 'New's Agencies'

I'm in agreement with Bandus on this one WeeGee They didn't use common sense to figure out the wrong from the right, there for they should be punished. Not only because of that, but because they murdered people If these lawyers let these people off scot free, and they murder again, then I'll yell for the LAWYERS to be prosecuted as well as the murderer's themselves

lol! Nice Tigerclaw, Nice! I loved it Keep this up man! MORE!

quote:Originally posted by Cc:

Bush not serving time? hmmm Believe it not, my father was in the military DURING vietnam but the unit he was in was NEVER deployed, so he NEVER saw combat so it IS possible that people serving during a war will never see combat depending on what there field is, my father was part of photograhy and according to him and a friend of his (who did see combat) they had all the photographer's they needed Again it IS highly possible that he never saw combat but he STILL served which STILL counts As for Kerry? Don't get me started please... you all know my stance on this traitor

I've heard, and I consider it a very VERY sick joke.. if it could be considered that Here's the problem, the democrated party... or rather liberal party... is desprete enough and stupid enough to try it.. although I hope they have enough brains to realize that doing such a thing would disrupt security, but hey? They wouldn't care... as long as they tried to make bush look bad. And if they do do that Steve, it'll only streaghten my belief that demonstrators should be shot on sight if they perform such a feat (if they protest regulerly, then that's ok. But if they do something to disrupt the balance of teh city.. like what Steve said, then I say they should be shot, because who knows? Maybe that person might just BE a terrorist) Anywho, such a thing would be a haven for the media. They'd LOVE to have that happen cause it would fill up the 15 seconds they need for a story.. (sighs) like I said, I hope there smart enough NOT to do that

Speaking of media bias, anyone notice that the protestors/demonstrators and such weren't(sp) shown on any station's during the democratic convention? Just watch though, during the republican convention all those news station will most likely show the protestors and demonstrators, why? Cause it's there way of attempting to damage the republicans. And, if they DO do that, then it'll show just how bias the networks really are. Then there will be no way anyone can denie(sp)

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: Kalshion you're right you don't have to prove anything to me. So I will just continue to be "scared" and call you a LIAR. When you can prove your assertions of fraud, I will be happy to retract my labeling of you as... a LIAR. If you are going to say that you ran a test and state that you PROVED a fact then you need to show the world... or you will be considered a LIAR. Did I use the word LIAR enough? You really are looking for get into trouble aren't you? Oh well, not my problem, keep cowaring coward. As for steps Preatty simple 1. Buy the software 1.2 If you can't buy the software for some odd reason, by an editor. Personally I used an AVID Express , since I have access to the editor because of my T.V. Student status 2. Upon connecting the editor to either you're computer or TV and VCR 4. Take a peice of footage from either off the net (if you're editor is connected to you're computer like mine is) OR, if you're editor is NOT connected to the net, but rather the VCR and TV then take a video tape of something you recorded perferably, in order to recreate the results, take some footage of Kerry or Bush doing a speech that last's for about 2 minutes (maybe more or less depends on how long you record a sound bite) 5. Upload that footage to the story board, you're footage will first appear in an area where footage stay's that isn't being used. Just drag it from there to the story board 6. Upon doing that, access the sound tab and then select the image or footage you've placed on the story board. Then bring down the sound level's of THOSE peices only 7. Once that's done. Take a mic and begin recording either you're voice or someone else's. Attempt to make it sound exactly alike and close to what the other person in the footage is saying by making it similer to lip movement, if there are also any gesture's adjust accordingly 8. Once that's done recording, enhance the sound a tad so that you can hear it (a lot of time's when you upload sound bites you might lose a bit of sound but I havn't experienced that problem with the AVID... yet) 9. Now that that's done, take that sound bite, go to the sound tab, click it, then place the sound either on the 2nd or 3rd line that either has a NOTE (musical note) or a CAMERA (sound from a camera) symbole. You might have to try more than once to get it right, it isn't easy trust me but it can be done with the right amount of patience 10. Once that is done. PLAY you're little invention and you should see what I'm talking about Preatty simple steps really. Although I followed a different set since I have more experience but these few step's SHOULD allow you to recreate what I have done (SHOULD) Super-emposing something over something is what most of these gaming company's do. Cinimatic's for example are created the same way using digital editing software. Now, in the line of digital editing for DEVELOPERS it's a different story. My editing skill's lay in the area of sound editing and video editing along the NEW'S industry and currently I'm learning a new way of editing (have to keep up to date) I must tell you though that learning to edit on an AVID IS NOT easy, AVID's are considered professional editing machines. If you don't feel comfortable with an AVID then I'd suggest another form of editing. I know of a few but those name's escape me, the editing software that come's with you're computer, Microsoft Edit, is useless, but could still work (ME is bugged and I can't seem to unbug mine, won't let me upload sound bite's) And yes, My computer is primarily set up for sound and video editing. That's why most game's don't work on this. Took me a couple week's to get UC to work If you DO decide to by the AVID Express software wise then you might need an editing graphic's card. Personally this computer has an external graphics card and an internal, the external is specially made by Alienware. The other one is internal and that's my editing card Editing graphics card's cost a lot of money there NOT cheap. Mine would've costed me over $600 but thank's to the fact that at the time I was in school, and in a TV program, it only costed me $300 I'm unsure if you can edit using a reguler, non-editing graphics card. I think you can but I don't know as I've never done it Also, there are two forms of editing. Linear and NON-Linear editing quote: Linear Editing - This process is basically mechanical in nature, in that it employs the use of Camcorders, VCR's, Edit Controllers, Titlers, and Mixers to perform the edit functions. This editing technique is performed in linear steps, one cut at a time (or a series of programmed cuts) to its conclusion. Non-Linear Editing - Gaining in popularity quickly due to advances in technology, pricing, and product availability, this method of video editing utilizes the computer environment to aid in the editing process. This process is almost entirely digital and employs no mechanical functions except for the input of the video sources and its final output to Tape or CD. Editing in this environment is essentially is a visual Cut-and-Paste method. If need more information from me on replicating this test please send me a PM. I'm sure DS and Jaguar don't want me to post any more about this here since it doesn't contribute to the topic And Takvah, I'll just ignore what you said since you have no idea what you're talking about. Plus you still like correcting people when that person has a way of spelling something

lol, see you are scared. Again, if you're so interested. Why don't you try it? I won't post this because you'll instantly say it's false, you've already done that to Jaguar and other members of this forum who've posted there fact's and there sources, After all, you ARE a liberal, and liberal's think there alway's correct and think that anything presented before them is wrong. So I say this: I don't HAVE to prove anything to you. And the evidence? The thing is if I post it you'll just say it's wrong, so what's the point? And if you use god's name in vain once more I won't hesitate to report you're post, you apperently need to understand that there ARE people on this forum who are very religious and don't appricate god's name's used in that manner quote: "super-em-posed" *snickers*. You apperently don't understand english, Jaguar already told you to stop correcting other people. I have a certain way I spell it because of how it sounds to ME, so STOP correcting me quote: word "liberal" and demonize it Wasn't use who first started this. Ever since the Clinton riegn*SP* Liberal's have been thought up of that because all they care about is themselves and not about others Liberal's just want other's to be taken care of by the government, they don't want people to succeed. Nor do they want people to know what's going on, truth in that saddly While Liberal's couldn't care less about the truth, Conversatives do. Conversative's are people who want to live life there own way. They don't want to be taken care of by the government, they don't want people to take control of others. For example, I don't want the government to control my life. I want to control my own life, if I don't make it so be it, it's my fault But the liberal government (democrats mainly) don't want people to take care of themselves, therefor they "Section Eight" house's for people to live in so that they can get off the street's The thing is, in my opinion unlike Jaguar's, you are not only a Liberal, but someone who is completely brain washed by not only the media, but by Kerry's Propaganda. You believe every little thing thrown at you by the traitor, Kerry. There is no point in showing you anything, no point in presenting any facts or evidence. You're to brainwashed, to liberal, to anti-american. To believe anything that we present here, that's why I didn't post the evidence before hand. The use of the word "liar" describes someone who is not telling the truth or present's something that is not capible of being done. In that light, what I did CAN be done and therefor calling me or anyone else a Liar when they either havn't provided any proof, OR the person CALLING the one a liar hasn't TRIED it has no grounds here. That being said, you can't call me a Liar just becuase you're to scared to try it yourself or ask someone to also try it. So, until you actually try it and discover for yourself how wrong you actually are, you can't call me anything.. I havn't called you anything here except a Die-Hard Liberal (which is saddly the truth) and no I don't know you and nor do you know me but the way you word you're sentence's and the way to disprove any fact's toward you, which in fact are true because of the sources provided and the evidence given, just prove's that no matter how hard to denie(SP) it you are STILL a liberal even if you think you're not Liberal's are always living in denial and you, Takvah, have proven that fact [ 08-05-2004, 03:03 AM: Message edited by: Kalshion ]

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: He was the one that provided NO FACTS. All he said was that he ran tests and that there was an image superimposed over something or other. And I'll say again "I proved you wrong" You're incapible of even TRYING to find out if it's possible and there-for you have no right calling another a liar when you yourself are to afriad to find out for yourself, so come back to me and discuss when you've done the same test, until then you can't discuss with me weather I'm right or wrong.. Cya *I can't stand to see the truth and won't perform the same test to find out if that person is correct* Liberal

quote:Originally posted by street: quote:Right now, the Terrorists can't get into our country because of HomeLand Security and Bush's new policy. There stopping more people at the border than before, but you'll never hear that on the news ROFLOL!! Laugh all you want Street, but it's true. Check the site's and do you're own research and you'll find it yourself