LostInSpace

Guess it just goes to show it's not who you sue but what country you place the lawsuit Friday, September 22, 2000 In a major defeat for the World War II reparations movement, a federal judge in San Francisco on Thursday tossed out a lawsuit seeking restitution from huge Japanese corporations that forced American prisoners to work as slave laborers.

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: We attacked Iraq, the number two oil reserve in the world. We wanted to attack Iraq EVEN AFTER WE KNEW OSAMA WAS IN AFGHANISTAN. Rumsfeld said, "there are more targets in Iraq even if he is in Afghanistan. WHAT THE HELL IS THAT? Still no stink?You insist on calling me nieve or ignorant. However, I see your point of view and understand every thing you've been saying I just dissagree with your opion. That is not called nievity. You are the one with blinders on even after I laid out Bush's strategy in the fight against terrorism. No one said that Bin Laden was physicaly in Iraq but his operatives were. You may believe otherwise but the facts are there. Let me put it simply. Think of an octopuss. The head is Bin Laden and the many tentacles are his operatives. You are trying to approach the head but it's fighting back with it's tentacles. You chop away at the them until there is only the head left undefended and vulnerable. And before you say there was no link between Iraq and Al-QaedaSaddam and al Qaeda WERE Linked. quote:He even went so far as to show the Saudis the Iraqi warplan when it was marked NONFOR (meaning NO FOREIGNERS). Say what!?Wrongo, show me the evidence for that. The only war plan that was leaked was from Chalabi to the Iranians. quote:You cannot be helped. As for calling you a kid... sorry, let me just say naive then. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that you were young rather than just ignorant.If you only half the stuff I know and have read. I am neither naive or ignorant. I just don't subscribe to the left-wing or liberal view point who are ruining America. quote:FOX NEWS ain't gonna tell you what you need to know to be informed. K?Niether are any of the other news media outlets. It always comes down to that doesn't with you left-wingers or liberals. The right-wing has how many news media channels? 2-3 maybe. How many do the liberals and left-wingers have? All the rest. But when you take examples off the right-wing news media it's as if you have taken it from the devil himself. Get a grip. quote:I've wasted enough time on you. If you can't be bothered to open your eyes then YOU GO FIGHT this war... and send the kids that just wanted an education through the GI bill home. K? After all you believe in this crap, right? Cheers. I am fighting this war by supporting our troops and the Commander in Chief whole heatedly. When you join the military, for whatever reason, you take all the risks that come along with that. The military is serious business and is not a playground nor is it just a financial institution because you don't have the cash to pay for your education. Of course left-wingers and liberals will have you believe otherwise. [ 06-25-2004, 03:29 AM: Message edited by: LostInSpace ]

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: We attacked Iraq, the number two oil reserve in the world. We wanted to attack Iraq EVEN AFTER WE KNEW OSAMA WAS IN AFGHANISTAN. Rumsfeld said, "there are more targets in Iraq even if he is in Afghanistan. WHAT THE HELL IS THAT? Still no stink?You insist on calling me nieve or ignorant. However, I see your point of view and understand every thing you've been saying I just dissagree with your opion. That is not called nievity. You are the one with blinders on even after I laid out Bush's strategy in the fight against terrorism. No one said that Bin Laden was physicaly in Iraq but his operatives were. You may believe otherwise but the facts are there. Let me put it simply. Think of an octopuss. The head is Bin Laden and the many tentacles are his operatives. You are trying to approach the head but it's fighting back with it's tentacles. You chop away at the them until there is only the head left undefended and vulnerable. And before you say there was no link between Iraq and Al-QaedaSaddam and al Qaeda WERE Linked. quote:He even went so far as to show the Saudis the Iraqi warplan when it was marked NONFOR (meaning NO FOREIGNERS). Say what!?Wrongo, show me the evidence for that. The only war plan that was leaked was from Chalabi to the Iranians. quote:You cannot be helped. As for calling you a kid... sorry, let me just say naive then. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that you were young rather than just ignorant.If you only half the stuff I know and have read. I am neither naive or ignorant. I just don't subscribe to the left-wing or liberal view point who are ruining America. quote:FOX NEWS ain't gonna tell you what you need to know to be informed. K?Niether are any of the other news media outlets. It always comes down to that doesn't with you left-wingers or liberals. The right-wing has how many news media channels? 2-3 maybe. How many do the liberals and left-wingers have? All the rest. But when you take examples off the right-wing news media it's as if you have taken it from the devil himself. Get a grip. quote:I've wasted enough time on you. If you can't be bothered to open your eyes then YOU GO FIGHT this war... and send the kids that just wanted an education through the GI bill home. K? After all you believe in this crap, right? Cheers. I am fighting this war by supporting our troops and the Commander in Chief whole heatedly. When you join the military, for whatever reason, you take all the risks that come along with that. The military is serious business and is not a playground nor is it just a financial institution because you don't have the cash to pay for your education. Of course left-wingers and liberals will have you believe otherwise. [ 06-25-2004, 03:29 AM: Message edited by: LostInSpace ]

How far back does your good save game go in game time. I'm asking because you should use at least three to four game slots for your main game saves. I use three. I save a game every 30 min or so. If there is a crash during one of the saves and the file gets retarded after that, I just go and reload the previous one which is only a 30 min difference. I haven't had a crash during a save yet but I do this just to be on the safe side. You might want to follow this strategy as well.

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: I ignored the fact that Bush is on the right track (according to you) because it is just a ridiculous statement.Not according to me but according to the evidence. Show me your evidence that Bush's strategy is not on the right track. quote:As for doing the dirty work... I guess releasing shepherds and piling up prisoners that have no information on TERRORISM in pyramids and homoerotic poses is your idea of what... a tea party? This nation is engaged in nothing but dirty work these days kid... read a paper. If you think that this is an isolated bunch doing this you're not very bright, the same homoerotic techniques have been observed in Afghanistan and Guantanamo.And how do you know these prisoners didn't have any information or weren't guilty of something. I know I can't say that for certain. If you believe that even a shepard can't be a terrorist or insurgent, I have pity on you. Anyone that is caught always proclaims they are innocent. You call what went on in that prison abuse? Have you read what went on in past war's POW camps namely the American pows in Japanese camps. The treatment in the pictures that went on in Abu Ghraib prison, was a walk in the park. Sure it maybe distasteful to the eyes, but in a conflict zone distasteful events occur. I have never said it was an isolated bunch, nor do I care, they are there not me and not you and they do what they need to do under those circumstances. Sometimes you just have to play the devil to fight the devil. READ A PAPER! You mean that liberal drivel I use for toilet paper. Yeah I give it the scrutiny it deserves with one eye. Oh yeah, if you call me kid again I'm gunna go down there and throw a goat on you!

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: I ignored the fact that Bush is on the right track (according to you) because it is just a ridiculous statement.Not according to me but according to the evidence. Show me your evidence that Bush's strategy is not on the right track. quote:As for doing the dirty work... I guess releasing shepherds and piling up prisoners that have no information on TERRORISM in pyramids and homoerotic poses is your idea of what... a tea party? This nation is engaged in nothing but dirty work these days kid... read a paper. If you think that this is an isolated bunch doing this you're not very bright, the same homoerotic techniques have been observed in Afghanistan and Guantanamo.And how do you know these prisoners didn't have any information or weren't guilty of something. I know I can't say that for certain. If you believe that even a shepard can't be a terrorist or insurgent, I have pity on you. Anyone that is caught always proclaims they are innocent. You call what went on in that prison abuse? Have you read what went on in past war's POW camps namely the American pows in Japanese camps. The treatment in the pictures that went on in Abu Ghraib prison, was a walk in the park. Sure it maybe distasteful to the eyes, but in a conflict zone distasteful events occur. I have never said it was an isolated bunch, nor do I care, they are there not me and not you and they do what they need to do under those circumstances. Sometimes you just have to play the devil to fight the devil. READ A PAPER! You mean that liberal drivel I use for toilet paper. Yeah I give it the scrutiny it deserves with one eye. Oh yeah, if you call me kid again I'm gunna go down there and throw a goat on you!

How many engineers does it take to change a light bulb? Avg. Engineer = 180 pounds Avg. Engineer can lift 1/2 body weight over his head 180/2=90 Pounds Avg. Light bulb = 4 oz. = .25 Pounds (1 Eng/90 pounds) * (.25 pounds) = 0.00277777778 engineers to change a bulb.

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: 1: You must be ... what LostInSpace... 15? You tell someone to go pack their bags and go get Osama? 2:Will I have $150 billion dollars to do it? I bet I could do it for a lot less than that... can I keep the change? 3: Your retort is the typical response from an inferior intellect. 4:Hey I know... he wants him, he can go get him... TEEHEE! I'm sharp. Don't like the President... MOVE TO CANADA! Yeah... that's it. Anyone that disagrees must be a traitor and a communist! Yeah COMMUNIST. Grow up.1: The meaning of that statement is if you wan't something done do it yourself. If not, you want to rely on other people to do it, then you just have to wait. 2: Now you're talking. I'll be waiting for your results in this endeavor. 3:And what liberal litmus paper do you base this on? 4:I'm not even going to bother with that one. quote:Originally posted by Takvah: 1:I gave Bush three and a half years to avenge 3000 Americans. 2:He hasn't done anything beyond destabilize the globe, create debt and engage in corporate welfare (very UNREPUBLICAN THINGS I MIGHT ADD). 3:Letting him do anything else beyond sitting on his ass in Crawford frankly scares the crap outta me! 1: There you go again. Proclaiming you want someone else to do the dirty work for you in your revenge for 3000 american lives. I don't see you running down to the nearest recruitment office to lend a helping hand in this effort. You cannot, I repeat cannot, put a time frame on this. In the spirit of SC It happens when it happens. It could take ten years to get Bin Laden and there is not one thing you or I can do about it. Putting a magical time frame on this is just a waste of time and sitting there and lamenting Bush is taking to long in capturing Bin Laden is just plane dumb. You cannot blame Bush on this. This is an intelligence and military issue. You wanna crank about how long it's taking to get Bin Laden go ask them. 2: 9/11 was a global destabilizating event in and of itself. The market itself and its fluctuations also add from time to time global destabilization, long before 9/11, but it has always rebounded. The same with Bush. So he stepped on a few toes. Big deal. What are we suppose to do walk on egg shells to appease other countries. In time, hurt feelings and bruised egos will be mended. As for the debt, years before 9/11 and the Iraq/Afganistan war we were, and still are, in debt up to our butts. From then, till now, the dollar bill isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Bush's added debt, to the trillions that was already there, isn't going to matter one way or the other. The dollar bill is worthless. The only thing that has kept the dollar from collapsing is that the entire globe is dependant on it and if it falls so does the global economy. 3: You know what scares me 4 years of Kerry. I notice you didn't respond to the other parts of my post about Bush being on the right track. In fact, you've totaly ignored it. Why? Because you know it's true. You cannot snap a finger and expect all to be right again. This is going to take time and I don't mean tomorrow or next year or the next. It may or may not who knows. [ 06-24-2004, 07:38 PM: Message edited by: LostInSpace ]

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: 1: You must be ... what LostInSpace... 15? You tell someone to go pack their bags and go get Osama? 2:Will I have $150 billion dollars to do it? I bet I could do it for a lot less than that... can I keep the change? 3: Your retort is the typical response from an inferior intellect. 4:Hey I know... he wants him, he can go get him... TEEHEE! I'm sharp. Don't like the President... MOVE TO CANADA! Yeah... that's it. Anyone that disagrees must be a traitor and a communist! Yeah COMMUNIST. Grow up.1: The meaning of that statement is if you wan't something done do it yourself. If not, you want to rely on other people to do it, then you just have to wait. 2: Now you're talking. I'll be waiting for your results in this endeavor. 3:And what liberal litmus paper do you base this on? 4:I'm not even going to bother with that one. quote:Originally posted by Takvah: 1:I gave Bush three and a half years to avenge 3000 Americans. 2:He hasn't done anything beyond destabilize the globe, create debt and engage in corporate welfare (very UNREPUBLICAN THINGS I MIGHT ADD). 3:Letting him do anything else beyond sitting on his ass in Crawford frankly scares the crap outta me! 1: There you go again. Proclaiming you want someone else to do the dirty work for you in your revenge for 3000 american lives. I don't see you running down to the nearest recruitment office to lend a helping hand in this effort. You cannot, I repeat cannot, put a time frame on this. In the spirit of SC It happens when it happens. It could take ten years to get Bin Laden and there is not one thing you or I can do about it. Putting a magical time frame on this is just a waste of time and sitting there and lamenting Bush is taking to long in capturing Bin Laden is just plane dumb. You cannot blame Bush on this. This is an intelligence and military issue. You wanna crank about how long it's taking to get Bin Laden go ask them. 2: 9/11 was a global destabilizating event in and of itself. The market itself and its fluctuations also add from time to time global destabilization, long before 9/11, but it has always rebounded. The same with Bush. So he stepped on a few toes. Big deal. What are we suppose to do walk on egg shells to appease other countries. In time, hurt feelings and bruised egos will be mended. As for the debt, years before 9/11 and the Iraq/Afganistan war we were, and still are, in debt up to our butts. From then, till now, the dollar bill isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Bush's added debt, to the trillions that was already there, isn't going to matter one way or the other. The dollar bill is worthless. The only thing that has kept the dollar from collapsing is that the entire globe is dependant on it and if it falls so does the global economy. 3: You know what scares me 4 years of Kerry. I notice you didn't respond to the other parts of my post about Bush being on the right track. In fact, you've totaly ignored it. Why? Because you know it's true. You cannot snap a finger and expect all to be right again. This is going to take time and I don't mean tomorrow or next year or the next. It may or may not who knows. [ 06-24-2004, 07:38 PM: Message edited by: LostInSpace ]

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: 1: You must be ... what LostInSpace... 15? You tell someone to go pack their bags and go get Osama? 2:Will I have $150 billion dollars to do it? I bet I could do it for a lot less than that... can I keep the change? 3: Your retort is the typical response from an inferior intellect. 4:Hey I know... he wants him, he can go get him... TEEHEE! I'm sharp. Don't like the President... MOVE TO CANADA! Yeah... that's it. Anyone that disagrees must be a traitor and a communist! Yeah COMMUNIST. Grow up.1: The meaning of that statement is if you wan't something done do it yourself. If not, you want to rely on other people to do it, then you just have to wait. 2: Now you're talking. I'll be waiting for your results in this endeavor. 3:And what liberal litmus paper do you base this on? 4:I'm not even going to bother with that one. quote:Originally posted by Takvah: 1:I gave Bush three and a half years to avenge 3000 Americans. 2:He hasn't done anything beyond destabilize the globe, create debt and engage in corporate welfare (very UNREPUBLICAN THINGS I MIGHT ADD). 3:Letting him do anything else beyond sitting on his ass in Crawford frankly scares the crap outta me! 1: There you go again. Proclaiming you want someone else to do the dirty work for you in your revenge for 3000 american lives. I don't see you running down to the nearest recruitment office to lend a helping hand in this effort. You cannot, I repeat cannot, put a time frame on this. In the spirit of SC It happens when it happens. It could take ten years to get Bin Laden and there is not one thing you or I can do about it. Putting a magical time frame on this is just a waste of time and sitting there and lamenting Bush is taking to long in capturing Bin Laden is just plane dumb. You cannot blame Bush on this. This is an intelligence and military issue. You wanna crank about how long it's taking to get Bin Laden go ask them. 2: 9/11 was a global destabilizating event in and of itself. The market itself and its fluctuations also add from time to time global destabilization, long before 9/11, but it has always rebounded. The same with Bush. So he stepped on a few toes. Big deal. What are we suppose to do walk on egg shells to appease other countries. In time, hurt feelings and bruised egos will be mended. As for the debt, years before 9/11 and the Iraq/Afganistan war we were, and still are, in debt up to our butts. From then, till now, the dollar bill isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Bush's added debt, to the trillions that was already there, isn't going to matter one way or the other. The dollar bill is worthless. The only thing that has kept the dollar from collapsing is that the entire globe is dependant on it and if it falls so does the global economy. 3: You know what scares me 4 years of Kerry. I notice you didn't respond to the other parts of my post about Bush being on the right track. In fact, you've totaly ignored it. Why? Because you know it's true. You cannot snap a finger and expect all to be right again. This is going to take time and I don't mean tomorrow or next year or the next. It may or may not who knows. [ 06-24-2004, 07:38 PM: Message edited by: LostInSpace ]

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: LIS... fear clouds judgmentIt does? Only if you let it. We fear death. We fear fire. We fear God's wrath (well some of you anyway). We fear the weather. We fear when we stand on the very edge of a deep canyon. Fear is a healthy thing and keeps us on our guard for dangerous situations. Maybe I'm cut from a different cloth. Does anyone else agree with this? quote:Originally posted by Takvah: Uhmmm... did I miss something? Is that hillbilly womanizer Clinton the President? Time to get over passing the buck and remembering who's in play here. Bush is the President. He says he wants Osama... so where is Osama? THREE AND A HALF YEARS... NO FRUIT... GREATEST NATION AND MILITARY ON THIS PLANET... YET FAILURE. I want it one way. I want Osama on a platter. No dead or alive about it... just DEAD will do. Why hasn't George, "brought it on!" *snickers* As long as people allow Bush to lay his miserable track record at the feet of Clinton nothing is going to change. Clinton isn't screwing up Iraq, Bush is. Clinton didn't remove our troops from Afghanistan and diminish our ability to capture Osama... Bush did. So please stop passing the buck for this guy. Apologists really piss me off. Later Takvah Well, since you want Bin laden so bad pack your bags, gather up all the weapons and ammo you can grab and don't forget your armor. Now go buy a ticket to Afganistan. When you get to Afganistan, go equip yourself with all your needs, don't forget about your rations, you are going to need it, and go search in the zillions of rat holes he's hiding in. That's assuming he's still in Afganistan. Good luck. What! You're still here? Man you are as bad as Bush. You talk the talk but don't walk the walk. Anyway, with the new desperate violence now errupting in Iraq and Letter: Al-Zarqawi tells bin Laden militants are getting squeezed and Sources: Senior al Qaeda official may have been in Iraq , you know Bush's policy on Iraq and terrorism is on the right track. If you think our massive force are spread thin, you can imagine the terrorist with their few and far between followers. There are so many battles you can fight. Just like in WWII, we didn't get the head guy (Hitler) we just beat the crap out of his war machine. This is the same strategy Bush is applying. We don't need Bin Laden to win this war on terror just the continued massive pressure on his followers. They will soon come to realize that it just is not worth it. So, let's just allow Bush to do his job and stop being back seat drivers. As for Clinton, you cannot talk about Bush and Bin Laden without him. We would have already have had Bin Laden in our hands if Clinton took the deal. Would this have prevented 9/11 probably not but at least we would have had the master mind already in our grasp to face the music. Sure Clinton is the past but he and his policies for eight years lead us to where we are now. [ 06-24-2004, 04:08 PM: Message edited by: LostInSpace ]

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: LIS... fear clouds judgmentIt does? Only if you let it. We fear death. We fear fire. We fear God's wrath (well some of you anyway). We fear the weather. We fear when we stand on the very edge of a deep canyon. Fear is a healthy thing and keeps us on our guard for dangerous situations. Maybe I'm cut from a different cloth. Does anyone else agree with this? quote:Originally posted by Takvah: Uhmmm... did I miss something? Is that hillbilly womanizer Clinton the President? Time to get over passing the buck and remembering who's in play here. Bush is the President. He says he wants Osama... so where is Osama? THREE AND A HALF YEARS... NO FRUIT... GREATEST NATION AND MILITARY ON THIS PLANET... YET FAILURE. I want it one way. I want Osama on a platter. No dead or alive about it... just DEAD will do. Why hasn't George, "brought it on!" *snickers* As long as people allow Bush to lay his miserable track record at the feet of Clinton nothing is going to change. Clinton isn't screwing up Iraq, Bush is. Clinton didn't remove our troops from Afghanistan and diminish our ability to capture Osama... Bush did. So please stop passing the buck for this guy. Apologists really piss me off. Later Takvah Well, since you want Bin laden so bad pack your bags, gather up all the weapons and ammo you can grab and don't forget your armor. Now go buy a ticket to Afganistan. When you get to Afganistan, go equip yourself with all your needs, don't forget about your rations, you are going to need it, and go search in the zillions of rat holes he's hiding in. That's assuming he's still in Afganistan. Good luck. What! You're still here? Man you are as bad as Bush. You talk the talk but don't walk the walk. Anyway, with the new desperate violence now errupting in Iraq and Letter: Al-Zarqawi tells bin Laden militants are getting squeezed and Sources: Senior al Qaeda official may have been in Iraq , you know Bush's policy on Iraq and terrorism is on the right track. If you think our massive force are spread thin, you can imagine the terrorist with their few and far between followers. There are so many battles you can fight. Just like in WWII, we didn't get the head guy (Hitler) we just beat the crap out of his war machine. This is the same strategy Bush is applying. We don't need Bin Laden to win this war on terror just the continued massive pressure on his followers. They will soon come to realize that it just is not worth it. So, let's just allow Bush to do his job and stop being back seat drivers. As for Clinton, you cannot talk about Bush and Bin Laden without him. We would have already have had Bin Laden in our hands if Clinton took the deal. Would this have prevented 9/11 probably not but at least we would have had the master mind already in our grasp to face the music. Sure Clinton is the past but he and his policies for eight years lead us to where we are now. [ 06-24-2004, 04:08 PM: Message edited by: LostInSpace ]

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: LIS... fear clouds judgmentIt does? Only if you let it. We fear death. We fear fire. We fear God's wrath (well some of you anyway). We fear the weather. We fear when we stand on the very edge of a deep canyon. Fear is a healthy thing and keeps us on our guard for dangerous situations. Maybe I'm cut from a different cloth. Does anyone else agree with this? quote:Originally posted by Takvah: Uhmmm... did I miss something? Is that hillbilly womanizer Clinton the President? Time to get over passing the buck and remembering who's in play here. Bush is the President. He says he wants Osama... so where is Osama? THREE AND A HALF YEARS... NO FRUIT... GREATEST NATION AND MILITARY ON THIS PLANET... YET FAILURE. I want it one way. I want Osama on a platter. No dead or alive about it... just DEAD will do. Why hasn't George, "brought it on!" *snickers* As long as people allow Bush to lay his miserable track record at the feet of Clinton nothing is going to change. Clinton isn't screwing up Iraq, Bush is. Clinton didn't remove our troops from Afghanistan and diminish our ability to capture Osama... Bush did. So please stop passing the buck for this guy. Apologists really piss me off. Later Takvah Well, since you want Bin laden so bad pack your bags, gather up all the weapons and ammo you can grab and don't forget your armor. Now go buy a ticket to Afganistan. When you get to Afganistan, go equip yourself with all your needs, don't forget about your rations, you are going to need it, and go search in the zillions of rat holes he's hiding in. That's assuming he's still in Afganistan. Good luck. What! You're still here? Man you are as bad as Bush. You talk the talk but don't walk the walk. Anyway, with the new desperate violence now errupting in Iraq and Letter: Al-Zarqawi tells bin Laden militants are getting squeezed and Sources: Senior al Qaeda official may have been in Iraq , you know Bush's policy on Iraq and terrorism is on the right track. If you think our massive force are spread thin, you can imagine the terrorist with their few and far between followers. There are so many battles you can fight. Just like in WWII, we didn't get the head guy (Hitler) we just beat the crap out of his war machine. This is the same strategy Bush is applying. We don't need Bin Laden to win this war on terror just the continued massive pressure on his followers. They will soon come to realize that it just is not worth it. So, let's just allow Bush to do his job and stop being back seat drivers. As for Clinton, you cannot talk about Bush and Bin Laden without him. We would have already have had Bin Laden in our hands if Clinton took the deal. Would this have prevented 9/11 probably not but at least we would have had the master mind already in our grasp to face the music. Sure Clinton is the past but he and his policies for eight years lead us to where we are now. [ 06-24-2004, 04:08 PM: Message edited by: LostInSpace ]

quote:Originally posted by Supreme Cmdr: This one was done on May 31st but kinda slipped under the radar. Hmm, maybe you should have use the TACOPS computer rather than the RADAR. "Overall, this is a very difficult game to learn, let alone master. The level of detail certainly makes it worthwhile to the hard core, but I felt it was too complex for its own good. If you enjoy a good fight, and are willing to put in the time, then pick up Universal Combat. It isn't bad, its just a lot to handle." Too complex? It's good to know, however, that my IQ must still be pretty good.

quote:Originally posted by Darkling: Oh you mean like how Clinton REFUSED to take Bin Laden into custody because he didn't want to derail the Peace process with Israel & the Palestinians? He was more concerned with leaving his Mark in history, than bringing a known terrorist to justice. Yes, ANY president indeed. Did anyone see the Clinton/Dan rather interview? Well I did and this is what Clinton had to say about that issue:"In his interview with CBS newsman Dan Rather set for broadcast on Sunday, ex-President Bill Clinton flatly contradicts his earlier recorded confession that Sudan offered to arrest Osama bin Laden and hand him over to the U.S., calling reports of such an offer "bull." "On the accusation that he had opportunities to get Osama bin Laden, had opportunities to have him delivered by the Sudanese, he said, 'absolutely, flatly untrue,' describing it as 'bull,'" Rather tells the Washington Post on Thursday." Clinton: Claims I Turned Down Bin Laden are 'Bull' Heres a link I'm sure Jaguar will get a good kick out of:Franken VS Clinton on Bin Laden "Franken wants to have it both ways, criticizing Bush for not doing enough prior to 9/11 and then for doing too much after 9/11. The porridge is always either too cold or too hot. If there is another terrorist attack in the U.S., the Democrats will surely flip back to saying Bush hasn't been doing enough." [ 06-24-2004, 01:26 PM: Message edited by: LostInSpace ]

quote:Originally posted by Darkling: Oh you mean like how Clinton REFUSED to take Bin Laden into custody because he didn't want to derail the Peace process with Israel & the Palestinians? He was more concerned with leaving his Mark in history, than bringing a known terrorist to justice. Yes, ANY president indeed. Did anyone see the Clinton/Dan rather interview? Well I did and this is what Clinton had to say about that issue:"In his interview with CBS newsman Dan Rather set for broadcast on Sunday, ex-President Bill Clinton flatly contradicts his earlier recorded confession that Sudan offered to arrest Osama bin Laden and hand him over to the U.S., calling reports of such an offer "bull." "On the accusation that he had opportunities to get Osama bin Laden, had opportunities to have him delivered by the Sudanese, he said, 'absolutely, flatly untrue,' describing it as 'bull,'" Rather tells the Washington Post on Thursday." Clinton: Claims I Turned Down Bin Laden are 'Bull' Heres a link I'm sure Jaguar will get a good kick out of:Franken VS Clinton on Bin Laden "Franken wants to have it both ways, criticizing Bush for not doing enough prior to 9/11 and then for doing too much after 9/11. The porridge is always either too cold or too hot. If there is another terrorist attack in the U.S., the Democrats will surely flip back to saying Bush hasn't been doing enough." [ 06-24-2004, 01:26 PM: Message edited by: LostInSpace ]

quote:Originally posted by Darkling: Oh you mean like how Clinton REFUSED to take Bin Laden into custody because he didn't want to derail the Peace process with Israel & the Palestinians? He was more concerned with leaving his Mark in history, than bringing a known terrorist to justice. Yes, ANY president indeed. Did anyone see the Clinton/Dan rather interview? Well I did and this is what Clinton had to say about that issue:"In his interview with CBS newsman Dan Rather set for broadcast on Sunday, ex-President Bill Clinton flatly contradicts his earlier recorded confession that Sudan offered to arrest Osama bin Laden and hand him over to the U.S., calling reports of such an offer "bull." "On the accusation that he had opportunities to get Osama bin Laden, had opportunities to have him delivered by the Sudanese, he said, 'absolutely, flatly untrue,' describing it as 'bull,'" Rather tells the Washington Post on Thursday." Clinton: Claims I Turned Down Bin Laden are 'Bull' Heres a link I'm sure Jaguar will get a good kick out of:Franken VS Clinton on Bin Laden "Franken wants to have it both ways, criticizing Bush for not doing enough prior to 9/11 and then for doing too much after 9/11. The porridge is always either too cold or too hot. If there is another terrorist attack in the U.S., the Democrats will surely flip back to saying Bush hasn't been doing enough." [ 06-24-2004, 01:26 PM: Message edited by: LostInSpace ]

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: You do understand Jaguar that in everything you said there is not one fact. This is the same line of fear that has been spewed since 9/11. I think that any President would be capable of defending this nation against terror. Well let's put it this way. Hmmm, you speak of fear as a bad thing but it is not. Fear is neither good nor bad it's just a survival instinct. If we had maintained a good level of fear since the first World Trade center bombing, then with 9/11 we would not have been caught off guard. And what was the response from us at that time with the bombing, oh yeah lop a few missles here and there and walla we have instilled fear into these terrorist so every one can go back to their rave parties, pot smoking, cocaine sniffing, booze drinking and just basically have a grand ol' time cause we have no fear it will never happen again because we showed them what's what. HA! Fear, we better, cause it will save our lives.

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: You do understand Jaguar that in everything you said there is not one fact. This is the same line of fear that has been spewed since 9/11. I think that any President would be capable of defending this nation against terror. Well let's put it this way. Hmmm, you speak of fear as a bad thing but it is not. Fear is neither good nor bad it's just a survival instinct. If we had maintained a good level of fear since the first World Trade center bombing, then with 9/11 we would not have been caught off guard. And what was the response from us at that time with the bombing, oh yeah lop a few missles here and there and walla we have instilled fear into these terrorist so every one can go back to their rave parties, pot smoking, cocaine sniffing, booze drinking and just basically have a grand ol' time cause we have no fear it will never happen again because we showed them what's what. HA! Fear, we better, cause it will save our lives.

quote:Originally posted by Takvah: You do understand Jaguar that in everything you said there is not one fact. This is the same line of fear that has been spewed since 9/11. I think that any President would be capable of defending this nation against terror. Well let's put it this way. Hmmm, you speak of fear as a bad thing but it is not. Fear is neither good nor bad it's just a survival instinct. If we had maintained a good level of fear since the first World Trade center bombing, then with 9/11 we would not have been caught off guard. And what was the response from us at that time with the bombing, oh yeah lop a few missles here and there and walla we have instilled fear into these terrorist so every one can go back to their rave parties, pot smoking, cocaine sniffing, booze drinking and just basically have a grand ol' time cause we have no fear it will never happen again because we showed them what's what. HA! Fear, we better, cause it will save our lives.

quote:Originally posted by Jaguar: OMG, that was fricking great!! I had not had time to go through everyone of those links until this evening. Well Done LIS, had me laughing, and the fireworks factory, OMG!! That was incredible..... Thanks, glad you enjoyed it. Makes for a nice detraction from the political debates dosen't it.

To those considering History. Take it. There was a study recently done where they compared History, Psycology, English and Math graduates and concluded that History comes out on top. The grads get hired immediately after graduation and are paid a lot more right at the start.