DennyMala

GEEZ!!!! No way I'm trying to read through that..... it reminds me why I left the university..... [ 07-05-2004, 08:53 AM: Message edited by: DennyMala ]

Here I am.... standing by for orders.

Yep...

I have no words.....I'm simply astonished.... How can theese people be real...

Defend should be a more tight order than escort.... but sincerely I've experienced few or no difference in in-game behaviour from my fighters or fleet crafts....

I know.... I've practiced for some time with an enemy ODS to find the differences..... BTW and a little off topic but not too much...about the artifact upgrades (the Karanian Mark IV reactor and the Tachyon Anagram Shield)... is changed something from BCMG...? I've seen in the appendix that the super carriers and G-super carriers cannot use these upgrades, they're only available for heavy carriers..... is this right? I thinked that super carriers was able to use all upgrades and artifacts.... However... after some tests with variuos assets I've switched to a MEGARON class heavy cruiser; I've traded the FIRETORM better crew and fighter complement and better PTA coverage with the better shield/armor protection and mobility of the MEGARON...... so I must join the ones who says "MEGARON RULES!!!!" [ 07-05-2004, 05:00 AM: Message edited by: DennyMala ]

quote: Originally posted by Supreme Cmdr: quote:Originally posted by DennyMala: (I'm gettin' fat... ) LOL!!!! I'm glad you liked it..... how about a clue in return...? ...

quote: Originally posted by malbeth: Hi, My save file dialog on Linux named the patch uc2.00.11.exe, i transfered it to the UC folder on my Windows machine and executed it, getting the same problem as mentis. After several tries i used Windows to download the patch, now the save file dialog named the file uc2[1].00.11.exe. Executing this file, it worked. I had the very same problem the first time I downloaded the patch, the point is that I don't have linux, I only use WINDOWS XP.....

I miss the PTA system of my old AESTROM in BCMG..... they fired in full strenght just in the aim spot....... now in UC they don't...

Too simple for the SC.... SC please enlighten us.....

I even kindly but firmly answer his post.... hoping that he would read it before the topic got deleted...

Great job PAPI!!! .... I'm gonna try this one of these evenings. Keep up the europeans good work!!!!

Try issuing the shuttle a jump to... order and while in transit issue the deliver order again..... that should do the trick. This has occasionally happened to me too, but I don't know what cause it. However to untow the craft, simply give the shuttle the TOW NOTHING order....

I must agree....like I said in another topic, Einstein unveiled the possibility to use nuclear power for the good of the mankind (he thought), people just built nuclear bombs.....

(I'm gettin' fat... )

It's not a so bad idea to let people do whatever they want in a sexually oriented game...I can't find anythis wrong in this... this can maybe avoid some violent fact in real life.... ... or however be an alternative way of RPing.....

quote: Originally posted by Freyar: Primus is a Galcom Fleet... hmmm... Primus is one of the EARTHCOM fleets, or better it was one of the EARTHCOM fleets since the SC cancelled it few hours ago....(see the Earthcom section of the forum for details...) PRIME FLEET is the oldest of the GALCOM fleets. If you wanna join us, HERE you will find what to do.

Freemark, read your PM and comply ASAP wit the sig's standards.

RTFLMAO!!!!

And please try to stick to a more understandable english on the forums.... there are people here from other countries that are already having a hard time with correct language.... Thanks on behalf of all the strangers.

I'm waiting for this since some time ago....

Yeah...but Vagrants, Questors and especially Ralixes costs a lot to buy.....

Shingen??? Are you talking about RIP...? Same avatar though.....

Indeed, but this seems to be the same old story of Einstein finding a way to use the nuclear power and then someone applied it to build nuclear bombs......there are good intentions but bad applications...... [ 06-24-2004, 06:15 AM: Message edited by: DennyMala ]

New frontiers of doping.....