Soback

Also Tokvah, you've said absolutly nothing to counter my previous posts, or answer any of the questions I've posed. So that draws me to the conclusion that you have no facts that will counter what I've posted. If you are going to post a reply, please don't answer my comments/questions with any emotional rethoric because it has no basis. If you have any argument that has weight to it, I can listen and seriously consider it.

I'll say it again, my facts still stand because that's what they are, facts. What you just said is just an emotion loaded opinion. Yes, Middle eastern terrorists sure have people of other ethnicities who symphatize with them, however, I have not seen people of other enthnicites blowing up airliners over US soil. So untill that happens, the chances that the airliner will be brought down by somebody of Middle eastern descent still stand, it's simply logic. How are you going to argue that? All you have said is something about your rights trampled, well, I'll tell you what, till your opinion of your rights being trampled outweights the security that must be provided so that hundreds of people don't die, that's the way it will be. And also, since looks like there's dry runs, it means they are practicing, which means that if there was less security and more rights given to people that would mean another attack would have occured, but since they are practicing and obviously not being searched and stoped it means that another attack WILL eventually occur. It's just that simple, I can't believe that people have the information starring them in the face and instead of making deductions and forming coherent thoughts all they can do is spew some heartfelt crap about this and that and the other.

I'll say it again, my facts still stand because that's what they are, facts. What you just said is just an emotion loaded opinion. Yes, Middle eastern terrorists sure have people of other ethnicities who symphatize with them, however, I have not seen people of other enthnicites blowing up airliners over US soil. So untill that happens, the chances that the airliner will be brought down by somebody of Middle eastern descent still stand, it's simply logic. How are you going to argue that? All you have said is something about your rights trampled, well, I'll tell you what, till your opinion of your rights being trampled outweights the security that must be provided so that hundreds of people don't die, that's the way it will be. And also, since looks like there's dry runs, it means they are practicing, which means that if there was less security and more rights given to people that would mean another attack would have occured, but since they are practicing and obviously not being searched and stoped it means that another attack WILL eventually occur. It's just that simple, I can't believe that people have the information starring them in the face and instead of making deductions and forming coherent thoughts all they can do is spew some heartfelt crap about this and that and the other.

Also to Takvah: There's nothing racist about any of that. It's math and logic. When you take statistics and you hear that most people who have aids are either black or of hispanic descent is that racist or is that math? When they say that most managerial jobs are held by white people, is that racist or is that math? Well, I guess for you it all depends, if you don't like the statement, it's racist, if you do, then it's math. Well that would mean that MATH IS RACIST> LOL. Your statement shows how you vote, and how conservative you are, you vote with emotions, not facts, and liberal/democratic party is best known for it's emotional campaigns. Want a hard fact proof, just close your eyes and listen to Kery's speaches, and then compare then to Bushes. Then think who gives you the facts and who's trying to rile you up with emotions.

Also to Takvah: There's nothing racist about any of that. It's math and logic. When you take statistics and you hear that most people who have aids are either black or of hispanic descent is that racist or is that math? When they say that most managerial jobs are held by white people, is that racist or is that math? Well, I guess for you it all depends, if you don't like the statement, it's racist, if you do, then it's math. Well that would mean that MATH IS RACIST> LOL. Your statement shows how you vote, and how conservative you are, you vote with emotions, not facts, and liberal/democratic party is best known for it's emotional campaigns. Want a hard fact proof, just close your eyes and listen to Kery's speaches, and then compare then to Bushes. Then think who gives you the facts and who's trying to rile you up with emotions.

To Takvah: How many Irish have blown up an airplane in US? ZERO, How many Boznians have blown up an airplane in US? ZERO, how many Chinese have blown up an airplane in the US? ZERO, how many Europeans have blown up an airplane in the US? ZERO, How many of Middle eastern descent have blown up AIRPLANES (multiples) in the US? Answer that Takvah, and then think if an airplane is filled with people of every descend flying in US from coast to coast, which of those people is more likely to blow that airliner up? You took math in school right? Hopefully, if you went to college you took more than math and can figure out pure probability, not to mention if you are involved in politics you can also figure out the political climate and which one of those people is more likely to do it too. But if you can't figure none of that out, depend on the old time and time again proven saying, "HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF"

To Takvah: How many Irish have blown up an airplane in US? ZERO, How many Boznians have blown up an airplane in US? ZERO, how many Chinese have blown up an airplane in the US? ZERO, how many Europeans have blown up an airplane in the US? ZERO, How many of Middle eastern descent have blown up AIRPLANES (multiples) in the US? Answer that Takvah, and then think if an airplane is filled with people of every descend flying in US from coast to coast, which of those people is more likely to blow that airliner up? You took math in school right? Hopefully, if you went to college you took more than math and can figure out pure probability, not to mention if you are involved in politics you can also figure out the political climate and which one of those people is more likely to do it too. But if you can't figure none of that out, depend on the old time and time again proven saying, "HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF"

No, you're right, I haven't read the Spiderman comics, I'm just saying my opinion, that "Go get'em tiger" sounded extreemly cheesy, and when he sticks his foot out in front of the train, he is not supposed to be superman.

And also, if you think people are being paranoid and profiling is bad. Here's and example. If I go into the forest to get some pine cones, I am not going to be looking for pine cones under every single tree, I'll be looking for pine cones under pine trees because they are the ones producing the cones. So common sense dictates, I am not going to be searching nuns, and some fat guy with his wife and three kids for bombs because they haven't hijacked and blown up any planes, I'll be looking at people of middle eastern descent because they are the ones that have. And it doesn't matter if they are dressed as doctors, musicians, businessmen or anything else, it's not based on profession, it's based on ethnicity because before they got on that plane to hijack it they had previous lifes as businessmen, musicians etc... So for that you can deduct that the planes are not being hijacked by nuns, or musicians, or doctors, but rather by people of a particular race and it is not white, black or asian.

And also, if you think people are being paranoid and profiling is bad. Here's and example. If I go into the forest to get some pine cones, I am not going to be looking for pine cones under every single tree, I'll be looking for pine cones under pine trees because they are the ones producing the cones. So common sense dictates, I am not going to be searching nuns, and some fat guy with his wife and three kids for bombs because they haven't hijacked and blown up any planes, I'll be looking at people of middle eastern descent because they are the ones that have. And it doesn't matter if they are dressed as doctors, musicians, businessmen or anything else, it's not based on profession, it's based on ethnicity because before they got on that plane to hijack it they had previous lifes as businessmen, musicians etc... So for that you can deduct that the planes are not being hijacked by nuns, or musicians, or doctors, but rather by people of a particular race and it is not white, black or asian.

Street, you already KNEW that Iraq had no WMDs? When you fly on the plane do you also already know before you get on it that there's no terrorists on board?

Street, you already KNEW that Iraq had no WMDs? When you fly on the plane do you also already know before you get on it that there's no terrorists on board?

LOL, now we know what to do. Just ignore the whining and they'll go away.

Is this even real? Come on guys he is just doing it for all the attention. And you, Derek, stop horsing around and focus on the updates and the next game. LOL

That's the world we live in today: 1. To check someone out = Hurt feelings, bad publicity, decreased ticket sales, a whole lot of lawsuits, and a multi million dollar fine = averted terrorist act. 2. Not to check someone out = maybe nothing, maybe a "dry run" (a practice run for the terrorists to hone their skills), no fine or bad publicity = ultimatly hundreds (best scenario, if not thousands) of people dead, a whole lot of property destroyed. What's better? Depends on what your views are, there are some people who think it's better for thousands of people to die than hundreds be put into an uncomfortable possition. You know what, I wish it would be your next of kin on that plane, see you stick to your views you hipocrats.

That's the world we live in today: 1. To check someone out = Hurt feelings, bad publicity, decreased ticket sales, a whole lot of lawsuits, and a multi million dollar fine = averted terrorist act. 2. Not to check someone out = maybe nothing, maybe a "dry run" (a practice run for the terrorists to hone their skills), no fine or bad publicity = ultimatly hundreds (best scenario, if not thousands) of people dead, a whole lot of property destroyed. What's better? Depends on what your views are, there are some people who think it's better for thousands of people to die than hundreds be put into an uncomfortable possition. You know what, I wish it would be your next of kin on that plane, see you stick to your views you hipocrats.

Yeeeehhaaaa, rofl. That's great.

Yeeeehhaaaa, rofl. That's great.

Nice

I don't know, for me this movie sucked. The first one was awesome, but this... Some of the things that ruined it: 1. In the first movie it was all about spiderman, he is the guy with the web, and the moves. When did he become superman? What was it all about when he stuck his leg in front of the train? That was pure bull. 2. Also the train scene, when he finally remembered that he is spiderman and not superman and shot the webs to try to stop the train, did anyone notice that he was holding the ends of the webs in his palms and that they looked like plain old nylon rope. 3. Also the all infamous train scene, when the train stoped and he was about to fall, the hand reaches out and keeps him from falling, you can totally see the padding. What with the multi million dollar movie they couldn't make the suit better? 4. Again the train, when they carry him inside, oh soo sooooo cheesy, the only thing that was missing is the music of "we are the champions" and then the voices, "he is no older then my kid" and the kids giving him the mask "don't worry we won't tell" sucked. 5. When Dr. Octopus crashes in and they all say " You have to go through us" when did this movie turn from a super hero to some .... 6. Skipping all the way to the end, when he rescues the girl and they are kicking back on the web, you could totally see the plain rediculous nylon rope. Again, with such a budget, they couldn't digitally add that? As a matter of fact, they could have probably made it cheaper digitally and make it look like they are actually ON THE WEB instead of leaning against it with the glow of the moon reflecting off of the synthetic rope. LOL, what a joke. 6. "Go get them TIGER?" ROFL

You know what's not so funny. The guys who wrote, debated and passed those laws are getting paid $80,000 or more a year, and times that by all the people who were involved in those laws, then think about your taxes and why the road on your street has cracks and pot holes in it. Still laughing?

You know what's not so funny. The guys who wrote, debated and passed those laws are getting paid $80,000 or more a year, and times that by all the people who were involved in those laws, then think about your taxes and why the road on your street has cracks and pot holes in it. Still laughing?

LOL< Ideal? What, kids are supposed to grow up now without any input from their parents whatsoever and go entirely on trial and error? No wonder the government is putting their noses into family bussiness now, it's because parents don't even do what they are supposed to do by nature. But then again.....

Sleep with the fishes, literally.

Hmm.. what's easier, recall 150 million toys or teach your children not to eat things. Here we go again, one childs parents didn't teach him not to eat stuff, one child suffers, everyone pays.