Charles Lindsey

Scriv is right about the short. Sucks. It "was" made for kids though. I liked the movie itself. Way cool. Superhero protection plan just kills me. Hehe. I loved the short costume designer. Engaging for the kids but enough humor for the adults. (I think I stole that from some review I read) 9/10

Your Jedi mind tricks don't work on me. I won't even download it.

...and going. Spirit gets mystery power boost. In other news Control of rovers shifts to Cornell.

I threw it into Paint Shop and resized it. It's kinda blurry but try http://members.aol.com/clind10107/bushbycounty.jpg

Don't get me wrong, I loved this episode. Circles within circles. It's like a spyrograph.

Dunno. I'm tempted to find out.

That island sure has it in for Jack. Charlie's personal growth almost gave me the sniffles. Who beaned Sayid on the head? Just as he was finding the signal. Was it the French woman?

Fingerprint authenticator at ComputerGeeks.Com Pretty neat.

I just want everyone to run around in their underwear again.

Welcome

Moral values were most important to voters.

Bush will win

quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by Cmdr Chavik: The full transcript from the Al Jazeera site is ummm, interesting. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks. That was interesting. _________________________________________ Hehe; raw copy and paste. Anyway, thanks. My thought is if he (Osama) "says" it is not in the hands of Bush and not in the hands of Kerry then is he not calling for the US to overthrow its government? Not that we would of course. But then he goes to say the states (nations) that do not attack us/him (uhhh who is us?) would not be attacked. Errrmmm.

Yahoo! front page or Yahoo! News front page is decent. Autoupdates and all that.

Very interesting. Home page for the episode with the ability to watch it from the web. I have seen about the last hour of it.

The full transcript from the Al Jazeera site is ummm, interesting.

Posted to superiormuscle.com on 12-08-03 06:08 PM

That's just it. This is all over the net but going through 8 pages of links on the Yahoo! search page not a single one points to any web page that even comes close to looking like a link from a Tampa newspaper. The article may be real but I doubt a Tampa newspaper published it.

Where is the link to the Tampa newspaper article? One of the rules for quoting stuff like this.

ALL the Citibank commercials Well, the indentity theft ones. But I just saw the "Eat a snickers, become president" . That was pretty good I thought.

The ABC message board for LOST . Polar bear theories and all.

quote:Originally posted by Jaguar: Oh please Takvah, if you haven't figured it out by now, then you never are. I have repeated it AD NAUSEUM, and again, if you haven't listened before, you're NOT going to listen now. Poor Takvah, ignored anything that didn't agree with his assumptions. One of Jag's posts If you answer the question "what's the real reason" then you are admitting there was different reason than the one originally stated. I.E. a lie. Yet I get berated for calling it a hidden agenda. I notice you haven't used the term multiple objective or fringe benefit. You specifically keep using "different reason" though not in those exact words. If the terrorists are flocking to where we are then wouldn't have afghanistan served the same purpose? Then it would have been a great fringe benefit while we were kicking Taliban rear. quote:Originally posted by Steve Schacher: You don't recall Bush ever mentioning the 17 resolutions over 11 years? Don't you remember Bush's own speech to the UN where he called their own credibility into question because of their lack of action on their own resolutions? Why do you think Bush sent Colin Powell to the UN to give his now infamous speech? Actually I do not remember Bush calling the 17 resolutions. Perhaps once, maybe a couple times. I remember "chemical, biological, and nuclear" weapons. I remember the mushroom cloud statement. I remember "this was the one reason we could all agree on". I remember posters on THIS board coming up with the resolution argument and the bad man argument in defense of Bush. Bush stuck with the WMD argument. IF he had stuck with the resolution argument I would have still disagreed with the war but wouldn't have nearly as much ammo against it. Do you remember that the weapons inspectors had gone back in and were finding the stuff they had catalogued before? Meaning they were untouched and not in use. It's all moot anyway. Kerry is right. We broke it we bought it. The only thing to do now is exactly what Jag has been stating.

Sorry jag, I was replying directly to Steve.

Bullcrap. Then why didn't Bush SAY that is what they were doing.? NO. It was WMD. IT WAS A MUSHROOM CLOUD OVER ANY PART OF THE UNITED STATES They couldn't stick with the UN reason they had to make up their own reason.