Jump to content

Charles Lindsey

Members
  • Posts

    2,865
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Charles Lindsey

  1. I'm curious too. Very disingenuous of the both of you. You mean WMD's "WERE NOT" the reason? I really want to understand what the reason was.
  2. I was wrong then. Apologies. People were changing names a lot back then with the way the board got set up. There were several people that registered when they were told not to. Remember that? I registered with the new (this) board but never RE-registered when Derek purged the people who should not have registered. That is why I have "A Long Time Ago" as my register date. Tac has "A Long Time Ago" as well so that is why I thought he was a tad earlier than you. Ughhh. Derek actually does have the lowest member number. But "that" displayed screen name tended to wrap thread title at the time. It was a bit weird. I'm babbling. Someone stop me!
  3. Tac would blow us both away I think.
  4. Gawd, don't let Tac in here.
  5. quote:Originally posted by echo: I was thinking they were dead too, and sort of living out something they really wanted. As for the dead people on the plane, they are still alive. Oh, you evil, evil woman. Quit making sense. quote:Originally posted by echo: Like the black lady said when the "Party of 5 guy" was giving her his condolences and she said he's not dead. Doesn't explain the polar bear though. I think I'll just wait for "them" to tell me the story.
  6. They aren't dead. Can't be. Then the dead people in the fuselage would be double dead. The unborn child would be ummm half dead? This one was quite spooky. I loved it. At first I thought the Island tried to kill Jack the doctor but Mr. Locke saved him. Then Jack found water, the tail section, and his father's casket all in one fell swoop. Was that casket empty? My reception was bad and I didn't get a tape this week because my parents had to get a new electric meter installed.
  7. So long as they still do the old red laser ones I won't mind. It will be a bit of a bother waiting for the standard to solidify though.
  8. Wanna be mean? Do the same thing but tell someone it's coke and give them a Grapico. That'll fry your brain.
  9. Scary Reminds me of the Simpons episode where Homer is driving along and sees a billboard and suddenly must have the product.
  10. May I? Mutiny: I already said nope and the media has backed off the mutiny angle. Discipline problem? Possibly. Contaminated fuel: Plausible at first, coulda been water or dirt. But the army swears no so ok I'll believe that part. I know something about fuel as well. My boss buys fuel for the fleet. We have one tanker. A six wheeled job with the little small 1000 gal (2000?) tank attached to the body. It's called a bobtail. There is no such thing as cleaning a tanker. At least not between loads. You run gas and empty the tank then you fill her up with diesel and vice versa. The tiny amount of either left in the tank does not harm the other. You wouldn't want a substantial ratio but cleaning? No. Armor a tanker: I read somewhere they were doing that. But just the cab. While Diesels are powerful I tend to agree with Jag. Armor the whole thing and it couldn't get out of its own way. Rag tag units: That's the gist of the rest of the story. Delapidated (relatively) equipment. Here I believe is the crux of the story. Even civilians call Guardsmen "weekend warriors". They probably felt slighted because the regular army got the good stuff and they got what was left over. They probably did believe it was dangerous equipment. Perhaps rightfully so. Even the army spokesman took it offline for a maintenance review. I'll wait for more along with everyone else.
  11. Darkling: So, the end justifies the means?
  12. But I must say thanks to LostInSpace for corroborating my story.
  13. Pardon me but it does not sound at all like the troops are revolting.
  14. What am I wrong about? Just adding to the fiction. But I am NOT wrong. THAT story emphasized the bad man theory. NOT the wmd theory. Tell me why this whole thing seems so fishy then.
  15. I was actually listening to a consertative radio show and the fuel was supposedly contaminated. WTF? But supposedly a whole umm platoon (?) refused to do the job. To clarify the above paragraph: I was listening to a conservative radio show and one of the parents had called in with this news. I know no more than that.
  16. Quite poignant. Be sure to add that the son was told to tell the police the bad man had nuclear weapons in his basement and could open his fridge and make everyone sick. Then when he was fully investigated there was nothing there at all.
  17. quote:It really seemed like one of those interviews where they just try to size you up and get a handle on your personality.Don't let them know about this forum.
  18. Ok, this is just rotten. AP and UPI reported that the French Government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror alert level from "run" to "hide". The only 2 higher levels in France are "surrender" and "collaborate". The increased level was precipitated by the recent fire which destroyed one of France's white flag factories, thus disabling much of their military.
  19. Thanks all. I shouldn't have gotten into it but sometimes ya just gotta say something.
  20. quote:No I was talking about Kerry totally in that sentence. I know. just trying to clarify things. quote:Activist judges scare me more then just about anything. Because that is what will bring it all down at once. Hmm well yes. But when does a society decide when a judge is being activist or applying the law fairly? Hmmmmmm. This is extremely difficult. Society votes for judges. Local judges are elected. Who votes for judges? I don't vote for judges. quote:When 79% of the populace says yes, and then 1 activist judge says no, the excrement will hit the fan bigger then big. I can agree with that. Following are Tac's quote:Then answer me this then: If someone from country X (who is not a US citizen) comes to the US pregnant, stays for the 6 months her visa allows, pops the kid out in US soil and returns to country X where she raises the child until its an adult.Is that child a US citizen? Is that child an 'american'? The difference in those answers is the issue.That child IS a US citizen. Is he american? Dunno. That one hurts. It is a strong issue. Shoiuld the parents be granted citizenship just because they popped one out? Ouch. ouch ouch.
  21. quote:Originally posted by street: quote: street, please. Commas are not to be used when you take a breath. LOL I had completed over 27 English credits, in high school, and almost as many in college. I had taken so many creative writing courses,I realized, long ago: One may do whatever one wishes with most of the grammatical punctuations.... structure of sentence.... or paragraph......unless, of course....a grade school teacher is grading your paper. You are utterly, completely, and unequivocally wrong. "I had taken so many creative writing courses,I realized, long ago: One may do whatever one wishes with most of the grammatical punctuations.... structure of sentence.... or paragraph......unless, of course....a grade school teacher is grading your paper. " One DOES NOT separate independent clauses with a colon. You separate independent clause not joined by a conjunction with a SEMI COLON. ONE DOES NOT overuse an ellipsis quote:(Main Entry: el┬Àlip┬Àsis Pronunciation: i-'lip-s&s, e- Function: noun Inflected Form(s): plural el┬Àlip┬Àses /-"sEz/ Etymology: Latin, from Greek elleipsis ellipsis, ellipse, from elleipein to leave out, fall short, from en in + leipein to leave ÔÇömore at IN, LOAN Date: 1540 1 a : the omission of one or more words that are obviously understood but that must be supplied to make a construction grammatically complete b : a sudden leap from one topic to another 2 : marks or a mark (as ÔǪ or * or -) indicating an omission (as of words) or a pause Pronunciation Key ┬® 2001 by Merriam-Webster, Incorporated Merriam-Webster Privacy Policy)"from elleipein to leave out" What are you leaving out of your sentences? Use english as you will. But, if you don't use it in the acceptable format, I will consider you less than informed. Your, sentences, they burn, my eyes. You type, like, Kirk used to, speak, in the old, star trek, episodes. We, will, never, come together, and, see alike, on this, subject.
  22. May I answer some of this stuff backwards? Thanks beforehand. quote:Tac Citizenship is a civic responsability, not to be given based who'se land your momma pops you out on. Tac; that is old, old, ancient stuff on umm I can't think of the word. It IS about which land you pop out on. quote:The immigration question got my attention. Kerry wants to let illegal immigrants to have the chance of becoming citizens IF they have no criminal record or IF their children are US citizens. Bush said he wont since theres thousands of people LEGALLY waiting to receive residence. Wasn't BUSH the one who proposed some sort of amnesty? The following quotes are all Jaguars. I'm not gonna reconstruct the reply with quote thing for every sentence. quote:Well, Kerry's vision is far more frightening to me. He wants judges legislating from the bench, and that scares me far worse then ANYTHING that Kerry wants to do. Apologies Jag, the second sentence is poorly constructed I think. You have effectively included Bush by mistake. "He (patently obvious "HE" means Bush because you nmention Kerry by name later in the sentence.) wants judges legislating from the bench, and that scares me far worse then ANYTHING that Kerry wants to do." quote:No, no, I know that you didn't say it, they said it during the debate...... I was just went there as I was answering you. Sorry, am doing like 4 things at once, and should have been more clear. My fault, sorry. Ok. I'll talk with anyone for any length of time about anything.
  23. I didn't say that. What are you saying?
×
×
  • Create New...